» Articles » PMID: 24035418

Image Guidance for Endovascular Repair of Complex Aortic Aneurysms: Comparison of Two-dimensional and Three-dimensional Angiography and Image Fusion

Overview
Date 2013 Sep 17
PMID 24035418
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of image fusion (IF) of preprocedural arterial-phase computed tomography with intraprocedural fluoroscopy for roadmapping in endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms, and to compare this approach versus current roadmapping methods (ie, two-dimensional [2D] and three-dimensional [3D] angiography).

Materials And Methods: Thirty-seven consecutive patients with complex aortic aneurysms treated with endovascular techniques were retrospectively reviewed; these included aneurysms of digestive and/or renal arteries and pararenal and juxtarenal aortic aneurysms. All interventions were performed with the same angiographic system. According to the availability of different roadmapping software, patients were successively placed into three intraprocedural image guidance groups: (i) 2D angiography (n = 9), (ii) 3D rotational angiography (n = 14), and (iii) IF (n = 14). X-ray exposure (dose-area product [DAP]), injected contrast medium volume, and procedure time were recorded.

Results: Patient characteristics were similar among groups, with no statistically significant differences (P ≥ .05). There was no statistical difference in endograft deployment success between groups (2D angiography, eight of nine patients [89%]; 3D angiography and IF, 14 of 14 patients each [100%]). The IF group showed significant reduction (P < .0001) in injected contrast medium volume versus other groups (2D, 235 mL ± 145; 3D, 225 mL ± 119; IF, 65 mL ± 28). Mean DAP values showed no significant difference between groups (2D, 1,188 Gy · cm(2) ± 1,067; 3D, 984 Gy · cm(2) ± 581; IF, 655 Gy · cm(2) ± 457; P = .18); nor did procedure times (2D, 233 min ± 123; 3D, 181 min ± 53; IF, 189 min ± 60; P = .59).

Conclusions: The use of IF-based roadmapping is a feasible technique for endovascular complex aneurysm repair associated with significant reduction of injected contrast agent volume and similar x-ray exposure and procedure time.

Citing Articles

Retrospective Comparison of Stiff Wire-Based 2D3D, Traditional 3D3D Image Fusion, and Non-Image Fusion Techniques and Their Role in Thoracic Aortic Endovascular Repair.

Osztrogonacz P, Garami Z, Lumsden A, Csobay-Novak C, Chinnadurai P J Clin Med. 2025; 14(2.

PMID: 39860307 PMC: 11766196. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020301.


A Review of Needle Navigation Technologies in Minimally Invasive Cardiovascular Surgeries-Toward a More Effective and Easy-to-Apply Process.

Steeg K, Krombach G, Friebe M Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 39857081 PMC: 11763737. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15020197.


Ten years of physician-modified endografts.

Sanders A, Gomez-Mayorga J, Manchella M, Swerdlow N, Schermerhorn M J Vasc Surg. 2024; 81(1):1-12.e1.

PMID: 39181337 PMC: 11637927. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.07.108.


Advances of surgical robotics: image-guided classification and application.

Li C, Zhang G, Zhao B, Xie D, Du H, Duan X Natl Sci Rev. 2024; 11(9):nwae186.

PMID: 39144738 PMC: 11321255. DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwae186.


Image fusion guidance for left subclavian artery in situ fenestration during thoracic endovascular repair.

Zhao L, Liu J, Cai X, Yang W, Wang J J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024; 19(1):104.

PMID: 38388911 PMC: 10885385. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-02561-w.


References
1.
Hirota S, Nakao N, Yamamoto S, Kobayashi K, Maeda H, Ishikura R . Cone-beam CT with flat-panel-detector digital angiography system: early experience in abdominal interventional procedures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006; 29(6):1034-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-005-0287-6. View

2.
Brenner D, Hall E . Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(22):2277-84. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra072149. View

3.
Jongkind V, Yeung K, Akkersdijk G, Heidsieck D, Reitsma J, Tangelder G . Juxtarenal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2010; 52(3):760-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.01.049. View

4.
Crawford E, Denatale R . Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm: observations regarding the natural course of the disease. J Vasc Surg. 1986; 3(4):578-82. DOI: 10.1067/mva.1986.avs0030578. View

5.
Greenberg R, Eagleton M, Mastracci T . Branched endografts for thoracoabdominal aneurysms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010; 140(6 Suppl):S171-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.07.061. View