» Articles » PMID: 24032009

Neural Networks Underlying Contributions from Semantics in Reading Aloud

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2013 Sep 14
PMID 24032009
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Reading is an essential part of contemporary society, yet much is still unknown about the physiological underpinnings of its information processing components. Two influential cognitive models of reading, the connectionist and dual-route cascaded models, offer very different accounts, yet evidence for one or the other remains equivocal. These models differ in several ways, including the role of semantics (word meaning) in mapping spelling to sound. We used a new effective connectivity algorithm, IMaGES, to provide a network-level perspective on these network-level models. Left hemisphere regions of interest were defined based on main effects in functional magnetic resonance imaging and included two regions linked with semantic processing-angular gyrus (AG) and inferior temporal sulcus (ITS)-and two regions linked with phonological processing-posterior superior temporal gyrus (pSTG) and posterior middle temporal gyrus (pMTG). Participants read aloud words of high or low spelling-sound consistency, word frequency, and imageability. Only the connectionist model predicted increased contributions from semantic areas with those computing phonology for low-consistency words. Effective connectivity analyses revealed that areas supporting semantic processing (e.g., the ITS) interacted with phonological areas (e.g., the pSTG), with the pattern changing as a function of word properties. Connectivity from semantic to phonological areas emerged for high- compared to low-imageability words, and a similar pattern emerged for low-consistency words, though only under certain conditions. Analyses of individual differences also showed that variation in the strength of modulation of ITS by AG was associated with reading aloud performance. Overall, these results suggest that connections with semantic processing areas are not only associated with reading aloud, but that these connections are also associated with optimal reading performance.

Citing Articles

The neural characteristics influencing literacy outcome in children with cochlear implants.

Koirala N, Manning J, Neumann S, Anderson C, Deroche M, Wolfe J Brain Commun. 2025; 7(2):fcaf086.

PMID: 40046341 PMC: 11881800. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf086.


Improving reading competence in aphasia with combined aerobic exercise and phono-motor treatment: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Boukrina O, Madden E, Sandroff B, Cui X, Yamin A, Kong Y PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0317210.

PMID: 39820216 PMC: 11737671. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317210.


The angular gyrus serves as an interface between the non-lexical reading network and the semantic system: evidence from dynamic causal modeling.

Junker F, Schlaffke L, Lange J, Schmidt-Wilcke T Brain Struct Funct. 2023; 229(3):561-575.

PMID: 36905417 PMC: 10978681. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-023-02624-z.


Semantic network activation facilitates oral word reading in chronic aphasia.

Pillay S, Gross W, Heffernan J, Book D, Binder J Brain Lang. 2022; 233:105164.

PMID: 35933744 PMC: 9948519. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105164.


Functional connectivity in the developing language network in 4-year-old children predicts future reading ability.

Jasinska K, Shuai L, Lau A, Frost S, Landi N, Pugh K Dev Sci. 2020; 24(2):e13041.

PMID: 33032375 PMC: 8186432. DOI: 10.1111/desc.13041.


References
1.
Milne R, Nicholson T, Corballis M . Lexical access and phonological decoding in adult dyslexic subtypes. Neuropsychology. 2003; 17(3):362-8. DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.17.3.362. View

2.
Poldrack R, Wagner A, Prull M, Desmond J, Glover G, Gabrieli J . Functional specialization for semantic and phonological processing in the left inferior prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage. 1999; 10(1):15-35. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1999.0441. View

3.
Binder J, Medler D, Westbury C, Liebenthal E, Buchanan L . Tuning of the human left fusiform gyrus to sublexical orthographic structure. Neuroimage. 2006; 33(2):739-48. PMC: 1634933. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.053. View

4.
Coltheart M, Woollams A, Kinoshita S, Perry C . A position-sensitive Stroop effect: further evidence for a left-to-right component in print-to-speech conversion. Psychon Bull Rev. 2002; 6(3):456-63. DOI: 10.3758/bf03210835. View

5.
Binder J, Medler D, Desai R, Conant L, Liebenthal E . Some neurophysiological constraints on models of word naming. Neuroimage. 2005; 27(3):677-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.029. View