» Articles » PMID: 24013348

Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Suture Techniques for Arthroscopic Transtibial Pull-out Repair of Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Tears

Overview
Journal Am J Sports Med
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2013 Sep 10
PMID 24013348
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A tear of the posterior medial meniscus root (PMMR) is increasingly recognized as a serious knee joint injury. Several suture techniques for arthroscopic transtibial pull-out repair have been described; however, only limited data about the biomechanical properties of these techniques are currently available.

Hypothesis: There are significant differences between the tested suture techniques, with more complex suture configurations providing superior biomechanical properties.

Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: A total of 40 porcine medial menisci were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups (10 specimens each) according to suture technique: two simple stitches (TSS), horizontal mattress suture (HMS), modified Mason-Allen suture (MMA), and two modified loop stitches (TLS). Meniscus-suture constructs were subjected to cyclic loading followed by load-to-failure testing in a servohydraulic material testing machine.

Results: During cyclic loading, the HMS and TLS groups showed a significantly higher displacement after 100, 500, and 1000 cycles compared with the TSS and MMA groups. After 1000 cycles, the highest displacement was found for the TLS group, with significant differences compared with all other groups. During load-to-failure testing, the highest maximum load and yield load were observed for the MMA group, with statistically significant differences compared with the TSS and TLS groups. With regard to stiffness, the TSS and MMA groups showed significantly higher values compared with the HMS and TLS groups.

Conclusion: The MMA technique provided the best biomechanical properties with regard to cyclic loading and load-to-failure testing. The TSS technique seems to be a valuable alternative. Both the HMS and TLS techniques have the disadvantage of lower stiffness and higher displacement during cyclic loading.

Clinical Relevance: Using a MMA technique may improve healing rates and avoid progressive extrusion of the medial meniscus after transtibial pull-out repair of PMMR tears. The TSS technique may be used as an alternative that is easier to perform, but a more careful rehabilitation program is possibly necessary to avoid early failure.

Citing Articles

Biomechanics of Meniscus Tears and Repair Techniques.

Ina J, Nelson G, Strony J, Tagliero A, Calcei J, Krych A Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2025; .

PMID: 40042779 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-025-09958-7.


Biomechanical comparison of all-inside meniscal suture configurations for posterior root tear: Three conventional stitches versus delta-grip stitch.

Ishibashi K, Ishibashi K, Tsushima T, Sasaki E, Yamauchi S, Kimura Y J Exp Orthop. 2025; 12(1):e70149.

PMID: 39845700 PMC: 11751621. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70149.


Biomechanical comparison of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene sutures of different thicknesses of the tensile strength for pullout repair of medial meniscal posterior root tear.

Kakiage H, Handa M, Takahashi T, Takeshita K, Chikuda H J Exp Orthop. 2024; 11(4):e70055.

PMID: 39411001 PMC: 11474232. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70055.


Biomechanical analysis of four different meniscus suturing techniques for posterior meniscal root pull-out repair: A human cadaveric study.

Chang T, Yang T, Lin K J Exp Orthop. 2024; 11(3):e70020.

PMID: 39318713 PMC: 11420464. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70020.


Arthroscopic Centralization of the Medial Meniscus Reduces Load on a Posterior Root Repair Under Dynamic Varus Loading: A Biomechanical Investigation.

Deichsel A, Peez C, Raschke M, Geoff Richards R, Gueorguiev B, Zderic I Am J Sports Med. 2024; 52(12):3030-3038.

PMID: 39279271 PMC: 11494841. DOI: 10.1177/03635465241274791.