» Articles » PMID: 38638113

Animal Models Used in Meniscal Repair Research from to : A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal J Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2024 Apr 19
PMID 38638113
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This systematic review, registered with Prospero, aims to identify an optimal animal model for meniscus repair research, moving from ex vivo experimentation to in vivo studies. Data sources included PubMed, Medline, all Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, Web of Science, and Embase searched in March 2023. Studies were screened using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Extracted data including animal model, type of experiment, type of tear, surgical techniques, and measured outcomes, were recorded, reviewed, and analyzed by four independent reviewers. The SYstematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) Rob tool was used for critical appraisal and risk of bias assessment. Out of 11,719 studies, 72 manuscripts were included for data extraction and analysis; 41 ex vivo extra-articular studies, 20 ex vivo intra-articular studies, and only 11 in vivo studies. Six animal models were employed: porcine, bovine, lapine, caprine, canine, and ovine. Longitudinal lesions were the most frequently studied tear pattern and sutures the most common repair technique. Studied outcomes focused mainly on biomechanical assessments and gross observations. This systematic review can guide researchers in their choice of animal model for meniscus repair research; it highlighted the strengths of the porcine, caprine, and bovine models for ex vivo cadaveric studies, while the porcine and caprine models were found to be more suited to in vivo studies due to their similarities with human anatomy. Research teams should familiarize themselves with the advantages and disadvantages of various animal models before initiating protocols to improve standardization in the field.

References
1.
Boenisch U, Faber K, Ciarelli M, Steadman J, Arnoczky S . Pull-out strength and stiffness of meniscal repair using absorbable arrows or Ti-Cron vertical and horizontal loop sutures. Am J Sports Med. 1999; 27(5):626-31. DOI: 10.1177/03635465990270051401. View

2.
Seo J, Li G, Shetty G, Kim J, Bae J, Jo M . Effect of repair of radial tears at the root of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus with the pullout suture technique: a biomechanical study using porcine knees. Arthroscopy. 2009; 25(11):1281-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.05.014. View

3.
Herbort M, Siam S, Lenschow S, Petersen W, Zantop T . Strategies for repair of radial tears close to the meniscal rim--biomechanical analysis with a cyclic loading protocol. Am J Sports Med. 2010; 38(11):2281-7. DOI: 10.1177/0363546510382847. View

4.
Rankin C, Lintner D, Noble P, Paravic V, Greer E . A biomechanical analysis of meniscal repair techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2002; 30(4):492-7. DOI: 10.1177/03635465020300040801. View

5.
Baroni E, Matthias R, Marcellin-Little D, Vezzoni A, Stebbins M . Comparison of radiographic assessments of the tibial plateau slope in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2003; 64(5):586-9. DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2003.64.586. View