» Articles » PMID: 23970791

Ultra-early Intravenous Stroke Thrombolysis: Do All Patients Benefit Similarly?

Abstract

Background And Purpose: We previously reported increased benefit and reduced mortality after ultra-early stroke thrombolysis in a single center. We now explored in a large multicenter cohort whether extra benefit of treatment within 90 minutes from symptom onset is uniform across predefined stroke severity subgroups, as compared with later thrombolysis.

Methods: Prospectively collected data of consecutive ischemic stroke patients who received i.v. thrombolysis in 10 European stroke centers were merged. Logistic regression tested association between treatment delays, as well as excellent 3-month outcome (modified Rankin scale, 0-1), and mortality. The association was tested separately in tertiles of baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

Results: In the whole cohort (n=6856), shorter onset-to-treatment time as a continuous variable was significantly associated with excellent outcome (P<0.001). Every fifth patient had onset-to-treatment time≤90 minutes, and these patients had lower frequency of intracranial hemorrhage. After adjusting for age, sex, admission glucose level, and year of treatment, onset-to-treatment time≤90 minutes was associated with excellent outcome in patients with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 7 to 12 (odds ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.70; P=0.004), but not in patients with baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale>12 (odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.32; P=0.99) and baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 0 to 6 (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.39; P=0.80). In the latter, however, an independent association (odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-2.01; P<0.01) was found when considering modified Rankin scale 0 as outcome (to overcome the possible ceiling effect from spontaneous better prognosis of patients with mild symptoms). Ultra-early treatment was not associated with mortality.

Conclusions: I.v. thrombolysis within 90 minutes is, compared with later thrombolysis, strongly and independently associated with excellent outcome in patients with moderate and mild stroke severity.

Citing Articles

Service delivery in acute ischemic stroke patients: Does sex matter?.

Medlin F, Strambo D, Lambrou D, Caso V, Michel P Eur J Neurol. 2024; 31(7):e16287.

PMID: 38553933 PMC: 11235595. DOI: 10.1111/ene.16287.


A new machine learning algorithm with high interpretability for improving the safety and efficiency of thrombolysis for stroke patients: A hospital-based pilot study.

Shao H, Chan W, Du H, Chen X, Ma Q, Shao Z Digit Health. 2023; 9:20552076221149528.

PMID: 36636727 PMC: 9829886. DOI: 10.1177/20552076221149528.


EndoVAscular treatment and ThRombolysis for Ischemic Stroke Patients (EVA-TRISP) registry: basis and methodology of a pan-European prospective ischaemic stroke revascularisation treatment registry.

Nordanstig A, Curtze S, Gensicke H, Zinkstok S, Erdur H, Karlsson C BMJ Open. 2021; 11(8):e042211.

PMID: 34373287 PMC: 8354282. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042211.


Intravenous Thrombolysis Benefits Mild Stroke Patients With Large-Artery Atherosclerosis but No Tandem Steno-Occlusion.

Wang D, Zhang L, Hu X, Zhu J, Tang X, Ding D Front Neurol. 2020; 11:340.

PMID: 32431662 PMC: 7214684. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00340.


Cohort profile: Thrombolysis in Ischemic Stroke Patients (TRISP): a multicentre research collaboration.

Scheitz J, Gensicke H, Zinkstok S, Curtze S, Arnold M, Hametner C BMJ Open. 2018; 8(9):e023265.

PMID: 30224398 PMC: 6150152. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023265.