» Articles » PMID: 23963892

Performance Evaluation of a Depth-of-interaction Detector by Use of Position-sensitive PMT with a Super-bialkali Photocathode

Overview
Date 2013 Aug 22
PMID 23963892
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Our purpose in this work was to evaluate the performance of a 4-layer depth-of-interaction (DOI) detector composed of GSO crystals by use of a position-sensitive photomultiplier tube (PMT) with a super-bialkali photocathode (SBA) by comparing it with a standard bialkali photocathode (BA) regarding the ability to identify the scintillating crystals, energy resolution, and timing resolution. The 4-layer DOI detector was composed of a 16 × 16 array of 2.9 × 2.9 × 7.5 mm(3) GSO crystals for each layer and an 8 × 8 multi-anode array type position-sensitive PMT. The DOI was achieved by a reflector control method, and the Anger method was used for calculating interacting points. The energy resolution in full width at half-maximum (FWHM) at 511 keV energy for the top layer (the farthest from the PMT) was improved and was 12.0% for the SBA compared with the energy resolution of 12.7% for the BA. As indicators of crystal identification ability, the peak-to-valley ratio and distance-to-width ratio were calculated; the latter was defined as the average of the distance between peaks per the average of the peak width. For both metrics, improvement of several percent was obtained; for example, the peak-to-valley ratio was increased from 1.78 (BA) to 1.86 (SBA), and the distance-to-width ratio was increased from 1.47 (BA) to 1.57 (SBA). The timing resolution (FWHM) in the bottom layer was improved slightly and was 2.4 ns (SBA) compared with 2.5 ns (BA). Better performance of the DOI detector is expected by use of a super bialkali photocathode.

Citing Articles

Optimum selection for multi-interaction events in Compton-PET hybrid reconstruction: a Monte Carlo study.

Tashima H, Nishina T, Takyu S, Nishikido F, Suga M, Yamaya T Radiol Phys Technol. 2023; 16(2):254-261.

PMID: 36943646 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-023-00714-5.


Technical opportunities and challenges in developing total-body PET scanners for mice and rats.

Du J, Jones T EJNMMI Phys. 2023; 10(1):2.

PMID: 36592266 PMC: 9807733. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-022-00523-6.

References
1.
Lau F, Vandenbroucke A, Reynolds P, Olcott P, Horowitz M, Levin C . Analog signal multiplexing for PSAPD-based PET detectors: simulation and experimental validation. Phys Med Biol. 2010; 55(23):7149-74. PMC: 3691840. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/23/001. View

2.
Maas M, Schaart D, van der Laan D, Bruyndonckx P, Lemaitre C, Beekman F . Monolithic scintillator PET detectors with intrinsic depth-of-interaction correction. Phys Med Biol. 2009; 54(7):1893-908. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/7/003. View

3.
Yoshida E, Kinouchi S, Tashima H, Nishikido F, Inadama N, Murayama H . System design of a small OpenPET prototype with 4-layer DOI detectors. Radiol Phys Technol. 2011; 5(1):92-7. DOI: 10.1007/s12194-011-0142-1. View

4.
Dokhale P, Silverman R, Shah K, Grazioso R, Farrell R, Glodo J . Performance measurements of a depth-encoding PET detector module based on position-sensitive avalanche photodiode read-out. Phys Med Biol. 2004; 49(18):4293-304. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/18/007. View

5.
Watson C, Casey M, Eriksson L, Mulnix T, Adams D, Bendriem B . NEMA NU 2 performance tests for scanners with intrinsic radioactivity. J Nucl Med. 2004; 45(5):822-6. View