Direct Measurement of the System Latency of Gaze-contingent Displays

Overview

Journal Behav Res Methods

Publisher Springer

Specialty Social Sciences

Date 2013 Aug 17

PMID 23949955

Citations 29

Authors

Daniel R Saunders

Russell L Woods

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Gaze-contingent displays combine a display device with an eyetracking system to rapidly update an image on the basis of the measured eye position. All such systems have a delay, the system latency, between a change in gaze location and the related change in the display. The system latency is the result of the delays contributed by the eyetracker, the display computer, and the display, and it is affected by the properties of each component, which may include variability. We present a direct, simple, and low-cost method to measure the system latency. The technique uses a device to briefly blind the eyetracker system (e.g., for video-based eyetrackers, a device with infrared light-emitting diodes (LED)), creating an eyetracker event that triggers a change to the display monitor. The time between these two events, as captured by a relatively low-cost consumer camera with high-speed video capability (1,000 Hz), is an accurate measurement of the system latency. With multiple measurements, the distribution of system latencies can be characterized. The same approach can be used to synchronize the eye position time series and a video recording of the visual stimuli that would be displayed in a particular gaze-contingent experiment. We present system latency assessments for several popular types of displays and discuss what values are acceptable for different applications, as well as how system latencies might be improved.

Citing Articles

The fundamentals of eye tracking part 4: Tools for conducting an eye tracking study.

Niehorster D, Nystrom M, Hessels R, Andersson R, Benjamins J, Hansen D Behav Res Methods. 2025; 57(1):46.

PMID: 39762687 PMC: 11703944. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02529-7.

Opportunities and Limitations of a Gaze-Contingent Display to Simulate Visual Field Loss in Driving Simulator Studies.

Biebl B, Arcidiacono E, Kacianka S, Rieger J, Bengler K Front Neuroergon. 2024; 3:916169.

PMID: 38235462 PMC: 10790882. DOI: 10.3389/fnrgo.2022.916169.

Assessing the data quality of AdHawk MindLink eye-tracking glasses.

Huang Z, Duan X, Zhu G, Zhang S, Wang R, Wang Z Behav Res Methods. 2024; 56(6):5771-5787.

PMID: 38168041 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-023-02310-2.

Expectancy or Salience?-Replicating Senders' Dial-Monitoring Experiments With a Gaze-Contingent Window.

Eisma Y, Bakay A, de Winter J Hum Factors. 2023; 66(6):1770-1785.

PMID: 37210670 PMC: 11044528. DOI: 10.1177/00187208231176148.

Training With Simulated Scotoma Leads to Behavioral Improvements Through at Least Two Distinct Mechanisms.

Biles M, Maniglia M, Yadav I, Vice J, Visscher K Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023; 64(1):14.

PMID: 36656567 PMC: 9872837. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.64.1.14.

References

Wang P, Nikolic D . An LCD Monitor with Sufficiently Precise Timing for Research in Vision. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011; 5:85. PMC: 3157744. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00085. View

Elze T, Tanner T . Temporal properties of liquid crystal displays: implications for vision science experiments. PLoS One. 2012; 7(9):e44048. PMC: 3439495. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044048. View

Fei-Fei L, Iyer A, Koch C, Perona P . What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene?. J Vis. 2007; 7(1):10. DOI: 10.1167/7.1.10. View

Loschky L, McConkie G . Investigating spatial vision and dynamic attentional selection using a gaze-contingent multiresolutional display. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2002; 8(2):99-117. View

van Diepen P, Ruelens L, dYdewalle G . Brief foveal masking during scene perception. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1999; 101(1):91-103. DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(98)00048-1. View

Bockisch C, Miller J . Different motor systems use similar damped extraretinal eye position information. Vision Res. 1999; 39(5):1025-38. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00205-3. View

Bodelon C, Fallah M, Reynolds J . Temporal resolution for the perception of features and conjunctions. J Neurosci. 2007; 27(4):725-30. PMC: 6672911. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3860-06.2007. View

Burr D, Morrone M, Ross J . Selective suppression of the magnocellular visual pathway during saccadic eye movements. Nature. 1994; 371(6497):511-3. DOI: 10.1038/371511a0. View

Geisler W, Perry J, Najemnik J . Visual search: the role of peripheral information measured using gaze-contingent displays. J Vis. 2006; 6(9):858-73. DOI: 10.1167/6.9.1. View

10.

Duchowski A, Cournia N, Murphy H . Gaze-contingent displays: a review. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005; 7(6):621-34. DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2004.7.621. View

11.

Wiens S, Fransson P, Dietrich T, Lohmann P, Ingvar M, Ohman A . Keeping it short: a comparison of methods for brief picture presentation. Psychol Sci. 2004; 15(4):282-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00667.x. View

12.

Greene M, Oliva A . The briefest of glances: the time course of natural scene understanding. Psychol Sci. 2009; 20(4):464-72. PMC: 2742770. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02316.x. View

13.

Aguilar C, Castet E . Gaze-contingent simulation of retinopathy: some potential pitfalls and remedies. Vision Res. 2011; 51(9):997-1012. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.02.010. View

14.

Henderson J, McClure K, Pierce S, Schrock G . Object identification without foveal vision: evidence from an artificial scotoma paradigm. Percept Psychophys. 1997; 59(3):323-46. DOI: 10.3758/bf03211901. View

15.

VOLKMANN F, RIGGS L, White K, Moore R . Contrast sensitivity during saccadic eye movements. Vision Res. 1978; 18(9):1193-9. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(78)90104-9. View

16.

Ross J, Morrone M, Goldberg M, Burr D . Changes in visual perception at the time of saccades. Trends Neurosci. 2001; 24(2):113-21. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01685-4. View

17.

Bernard J, Scherlen A, Anne-Catherine S, Castet E, Eric C . Page mode reading with simulated scotomas: a modest effect of interline spacing on reading speed. Vision Res. 2007; 47(28):3447-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.10.005. View

18.

Loschky L, Sethi A, Simons D, Pydimarri T, Ochs D, Corbeille J . The importance of information localization in scene gist recognition. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007; 33(6):1431-50. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1431. View

19.

Diamond M, Ross J, Morrone M . Extraretinal control of saccadic suppression. J Neurosci. 2000; 20(9):3449-55. PMC: 6773104. View

20.

McConkie G, Loschky L . Perception onset time during fixations in free viewing. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2003; 34(4):481-90. DOI: 10.3758/bf03195477. View