» Articles » PMID: 19399976

The Briefest of Glances: the Time Course of Natural Scene Understanding

Overview
Journal Psychol Sci
Specialty Psychology
Date 2009 Apr 29
PMID 19399976
Citations 147
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

What information is available from a brief glance at a novel scene? Although previous efforts to answer this question have focused on scene categorization or object detection, real-world scenes contain a wealth of information whose perceptual availability has yet to be explored. We compared image exposure thresholds in several tasks involving basic-level categorization or global- property classification. All thresholds were remarkably short: Observers achieved 75%-correct performance with presentations ranging from 19 to 67 ms, reaching maximum performance at about 100 ms. Global-property categorization was performed with significantly less presentation time than basic-level categorization, which suggests that there exists a time during early visual processing when a scene may be classified as, for example, a large space or navigable, but not yet as a mountain or lake. Comparing the relative availability of visual information reveals bottlenecks in the accumulation of meaning. Understanding these bottlenecks provides critical insight into the computations underlying rapid visual understanding.

Citing Articles

Does object-to-scene binding depend on object and scene consistency?.

Plano A, Williams C Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025; .

PMID: 40038159 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-025-03037-2.


Actions at a glance: The time course of action, object, and scene recognition in a free recall paradigm.

Reger M, Vrabie O, Volberg G, Lingnau A Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025; .

PMID: 40011402 DOI: 10.3758/s13415-025-01272-6.


How expectations alter search performance.

Paquette N, Schmidt J Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025; 87(2):334-353.

PMID: 39915432 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-025-03022-9.


Cortical Encoding of Spatial Structure and Semantic Content in 3D Natural Scenes.

Mononen R, Saarela T, Vallinoja J, Olkkonen M, Henriksson L J Neurosci. 2025; 45(9).

PMID: 39788741 PMC: 11866997. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2157-23.2024.


The Visual Integration of Semantic and Spatial Information of Objects in Naturalistic Scenes (VISIONS) database: attentional, conceptual, and perceptual norms.

Allegretti E, DInnocenzo G, Coco M Behav Res Methods. 2025; 57(1):42.

PMID: 39753746 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02535-9.


References
1.
Alvarez G, Oliva A . The representation of simple ensemble visual features outside the focus of attention. Psychol Sci. 2008; 19(4):392-8. PMC: 2587223. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02098.x. View

2.
Vanrullen R, Thorpe S . The time course of visual processing: from early perception to decision-making. J Cogn Neurosci. 2001; 13(4):454-61. DOI: 10.1162/08989290152001880. View

3.
Haberman J, Whitney D . Rapid extraction of mean emotion and gender from sets of faces. Curr Biol. 2007; 17(17):R751-3. PMC: 3849410. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.039. View

4.
Potter M . Meaning in visual search. Science. 1975; 187(4180):965-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1145183. View

5.
Pelli D . The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis. 1997; 10(4):437-42. View