» Articles » PMID: 23943885

Advanced Diagnostic Breast Cancer Imaging: Variation and Patterns of Care in Washington State

Overview
Journal J Oncol Pract
Specialty Oncology
Date 2013 Aug 15
PMID 23943885
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Because receipt of breast imaging likely occurs in nonrandom patterns, selection bias is an important issue in studies that attempt to elucidate associations between imaging and breast cancer outcomes. The purpose of this study was to analyze use of advanced diagnostic imaging in a cohort of patients with breast cancer insured by commercial, managed care, and public health plans by demographic, health insurance, and clinical variables from 2002 to 2009.

Methods: We identified women with breast cancer diagnoses from a Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry whose data could be linked to claims from participating health plans. We examined imaging that occurred between cancer diagnosis and initiation of treatment and classified patients according to receipt of (1) mammography or ultrasound only; (2) breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); and (3) other advanced imaging (computed tomography [CT] of the chest, abdoment, and pelvis; positron emission tomography [PET]; or PET-CT). We used logistic regression to identify factors associated with receipt of breast MRI as well as other advanced imaging.

Results: Commercial health plan, younger age, and later year of diagnosis were strongly associated with receipt of breast MRI and other advanced imaging. Women with prescription drug plans and those who had less comorbidities were more likely to have received breast MRI.

Conclusion: Use of breast MRI and other advanced imaging is increasing among patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer; individual patient and insurance-related factors are associated with receipt of these imaging tests. Whether use of diagnostic advanced imaging affects outcomes such as re-excision, cancer recurrence, mortality rates, and costs of breast cancer treatment remains to be determined.

Citing Articles

Identifying tests related to breast cancer care in claims data.

Franc B, Thombley R, Luo Y, Boscardin W, Rugo H, Seidenwurm D Breast J. 2019; 26(6):1227-1230.

PMID: 31736191 PMC: 7304302. DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13691.


State Variation in the Receipt of a Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Among Women Who Received a Diagnosis of Invasive Unilateral Early-Stage Breast Cancer in the United States, 2004-2012.

Nash R, Goodman M, Lin C, Freedman R, Dominici L, Ward K JAMA Surg. 2017; 152(7):648-657.

PMID: 28355431 PMC: 5831458. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0115.


Advanced Imaging and Receipt of Guideline Concordant Care in Women with Early Stage Breast Cancer.

Loggers E, Buist D, Gold L, Zeliadt S, Hunter Merrill R, Etzioni R Int J Breast Cancer. 2016; 2016:2182985.

PMID: 27525122 PMC: 4976155. DOI: 10.1155/2016/2182985.


A blood screening test for Alzheimer's disease.

OBryant S, Edwards M, Johnson L, Hall J, Villarreal A, Britton G Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2016; 3:83-90.

PMID: 27453929 PMC: 4941038. DOI: 10.1016/j.dadm.2016.06.004.


Breast Cancer in the Elderly: Is MRI Helpful?.

Pilewskie M, Hirsch A, Eaton A, Stempel M, Gemignani M Breast J. 2015; 21(6):651-7.

PMID: 26400412 PMC: 4639454. DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12504.


References
1.
Gold L, Klein G, Carr L, Kessler L, Sullivan S . The emergence of diagnostic imaging technologies in breast cancer: discovery, regulatory approval, reimbursement, and adoption in clinical guidelines. Cancer Imaging. 2012; 12:13-24. PMC: 3266577. DOI: 10.1102/1470-7330.2012.0003. View

2.
Deurloo E, Klein Zeggelink W, Teertstra H, Peterse J, Rutgers E, Muller S . Contrast-enhanced MRI in breast cancer patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy: complementary value for subgroups of patients. Eur Radiol. 2005; 16(3):692-701. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-0043-y. View

3.
Hwang N, Schiller D, Crystal P, Maki E, McCready D . Magnetic resonance imaging in the planning of initial lumpectomy for invasive breast carcinoma: its effect on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conservation therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009; 16(11):3000-9. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0607-1. View

4.
Solin L, Orel S, Hwang W, Harris E, Schnall M . Relationship of breast magnetic resonance imaging to outcome after breast-conservation treatment with radiation for women with early-stage invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(3):386-91. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.5448. View

5.
Meguerditchian A, Stewart A, Roistacher J, Watroba N, Cropp M, Edge S . Claims data linked to hospital registry data enhance evaluation of the quality of care of breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2010; 101(7):593-9. DOI: 10.1002/jso.21528. View