MRI Compared to Conventional Diagnostic Work-up in the Detection and Evaluation of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast: a Review of Existing Literature

Overview

Journal Breast Cancer Res Treat

Specialty Oncology

Date 2007 Nov 29

PMID 18043894

Citations 71

Authors

Ritse M Mann

Yvonne L Hoogeveen

Johan G Blickman

Carla Boetes

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: The clinical diagnosis and management of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast presents difficulties. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been proposed as the imaging modality of choice for the evaluation of ILC. Small studies addressing different aspects of MRI in ILC have been presented but no large series to date. To address the usefulness of MRI in the work-up of ILC, we performed a review of the currently published literature.

Materials And Methods: We performed a literature search using the query "lobular AND (MRI OR MR OR MRT OR magnetic)" in the Cochrane library, PubMed and scholar.google.com, to retrieve all articles that dealt with the use of MRI in patients with ILC. We addressed sensitivity, morphologic appearance, correlation with pathology, detection of additional lesions, and impact of MRI on surgery as different endpoints. Whenever possible we performed meta-analysis of the pooled data.

Results: Sensitivity is 93.3% and equal to overall sensitivity of MRI for malignancy in the breast. Morphologic appearance is highly heterogeneous and probably heavily influenced by interreader variability. Correlation with pathology ranges from 0.81 to 0.97; overestimation of lesion size occurs but is rare. In 32% of patients, additional ipsilateral lesions are detected and in 7% contralateral lesions are only detected by MRI. Consequently, MRI induces change in surgical management in 28.3% of cases.

Conclusion: This analysis indicates MRI to be valuable in the work-up of ILC. It provides additional knowledge that cannot be obtained by conventional imaging modalities which can be helpful in patient treatment.

Citing Articles

Invasive lobular carcinoma subgroup analysis of the MIPA study: real-world prospective data on preoperative MRI impact across the globe.

Pires-Goncalves L Eur Radiol. 2025; .

PMID: 40021501 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-11414-6.

Ultrafast sequence-based prediction model and nomogram to differentiate additional suspicious lesions on preoperative breast MRI.

Kim H, Chi S, Kim K, Han B, Ko E, Choi J Eur Radiol. 2024; 35(1):188-201.

PMID: 39014088 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10931-0.

Breast Radiologists' Perceptions on the Detection and Management of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma: Most Agree Imaging Beyond Mammography Is Warranted.

Coffey K, Berg W, Dodelzon K, Jochelson M, Mullen L, Parikh J J Breast Imaging. 2024; 6(2):157-165.

PMID: 38340343 PMC: 10983784. DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbad112.

Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation of Nonmass Enhancement Contiguous with Malignant Index Breast Cancer Masses at Preoperative Breast MRI.

Nguyen D, Lotfalla M, Cimino-Mathews A, Habibi M, Ambinder E Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2024; 6(2):e230060.

PMID: 38305717 PMC: 10988334. DOI: 10.1148/rycan.230060.

Breast surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with lobular carcinoma: surgical and oncologic outcome.

van Hemert A, van Loevezijn A, Bosman A, Vlahu C, Loo C, Vrancken Peeters M Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024; 204(3):497-507.

PMID: 38189904 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07192-8.

References

Arpino G, Bardou V, Clark G, Elledge R . Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: tumor characteristics and clinical outcome. Breast Cancer Res. 2004; 6(3):R149-56. PMC: 400666. DOI: 10.1186/bcr767. View

Rissanen T, Tikkakoski T, Autio A, Apaja-Sarkkinen M . Ultrasonography of invasive lobular breast carcinoma. Acta Radiol. 1998; 39(3):285-91. DOI: 10.1080/02841859809172196. View

Skaane P, SKJORTEN F . Ultrasonographic evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma. Acta Radiol. 1999; 40(4):369-75. DOI: 10.3109/02841859909177749. View

Cawson J, LAW E, Kavanagh A . Invasive lobular carcinoma: sonographic features of cancers detected in a BreastScreen Program. Australas Radiol. 2001; 45(1):25-30. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1673.2001.00867.x. View

Boetes C, Veltman J, van Die L, Bult P, Wobbes T, Barentsz J . The role of MRI in invasive lobular carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004; 86(1):31-7. DOI: 10.1023/B:BREA.0000032921.10481.dc. View

Molland J, Donnellan M, Janu N, Carmalt H, Kennedy C, Gillett D . Infiltrating lobular carcinoma--a comparison of diagnosis, management and outcome with infiltrating duct carcinoma. Breast. 2004; 13(5):389-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2004.03.004. View

Santiago R, Harris E, Qin L, Hwang W, Solin L . Similar long-term results of breast-conservation treatment for Stage I and II invasive lobular carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: The University of Pennsylvania experience. Cancer. 2005; 103(12):2447-54. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21071. View

Le Gal M, Ollivier L, Asselain B, Meunier M, Laurent M, Vielh P . Mammographic features of 455 invasive lobular carcinomas. Radiology. 1992; 185(3):705-8. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.185.3.1438749. View

Fabre Demard N, Boulet P, Prat X, Charra L, Lesnik A, Taourel P . [Breast MRI in invasive lobular carcinoma: diagnosis and staging]. J Radiol. 2005; 86(9 Pt 1):1027-34. DOI: 10.1016/s0221-0363(05)81487-8. View

10.

Boetes C, Strijk S, Holland R, Barentsz J, van der Sluis R, Ruijs J . False-negative MR imaging of malignant breast tumors. Eur Radiol. 1997; 7(8):1231-4. DOI: 10.1007/s003300050281. View

11.

Helvie M, Paramagul C, OBERMAN H, Adler D . Invasive lobular carcinoma. Imaging features and clinical detection. Invest Radiol. 1993; 28(3):202-7. DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199303000-00002. View

12.

Orel S, SCHNALL M . MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology. 2001; 220(1):13-30. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl3113. View

13.

Cornford E, Wilson A, Athanassiou E, Galea M, Ellis I, Elston C . Mammographic features of invasive lobular and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: a comparative analysis. Br J Radiol. 1995; 68(809):450-3. DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-68-809-450. View

14.

Yeh E, Slanetz P, Edmister W, Talele A, Monticciolo D, Kopans D . Invasive lobular carcinoma: spectrum of enhancement and morphology on magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J. 2003; 9(1):13-8. DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2003.09104.x. View

15.

Bluemke D, Gatsonis C, Chen M, DeAngelis G, DeBruhl N, Harms S . Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA. 2004; 292(22):2735-42. DOI: 10.1001/jama.292.22.2735. View

16.

Li C, Daling J, Malone K, Bernstein L, Marchbanks P, Liff J . Relationship between established breast cancer risk factors and risk of seven different histologic types of invasive breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006; 15(5):946-54. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0881. View

17.

Korhonen T, Huhtala H, Holli K . A comparison of the biological and clinical features of invasive lobular and ductal carcinomas of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004; 85(1):23-9. DOI: 10.1023/B:BREA.0000021038.97593.8b. View

18.

Evans N, Lyons K . The use of ultrasound in the diagnosis of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast less than 10 mm in size. Clin Radiol. 2000; 55(4):261-3. DOI: 10.1053/crad.1999.0291. View

19.

Qayyum A, Birdwell R, Daniel B, Nowels K, Jeffrey S, Agoston T . MR imaging features of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: histopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 178(5):1227-32. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.178.5.1781227. View

20.

Kneeshaw P, Turnbull L, Smith A, Drew P . Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging aids the surgical management of invasive lobular breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003; 29(1):32-7. DOI: 10.1053/ejso.2002.1391. View