» Articles » PMID: 23902527

Emergency Treatment on Facial Laceration of Dog Bite Wounds with Immediate Primary Closure: a Prospective Randomized Trial Study

Overview
Journal BMC Emerg Med
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2013 Aug 2
PMID 23902527
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To investigate the emergency treatment on facial laceration of dog bite wounds and identify whether immediate primary closure is feasible.

Methods: Six hundred cases with facial laceration attacked by dog were divided into two groups randomly and evenly. After thorough debridement, the facial lacerations of group A were left open, while the lacerations of group B were undertaken immediate primary closure. Antibiotics use was administrated only after wound infected, not prophylactically given. The infection rate, infection time and healing time were analyzed.

Results: The infection rate of group A and B was 8.3% and 6.3% respectively (P>0.05); the infection time was 26.3 ± 11.6h and 24.9 ± 13.8h respectively (P>0.05), the healing time was 9.12 ± 1.30 d and 6.57 ± 0.49 d respectively (P<0.05) in taintless cases, 14.24 ± 2.63 d and 10.65 ± 1.69 d respectively (P<0.05) in infected cases.Compared with group A, there was no evident tendency in increasing infection rate (8.3% in group A and 6.3% in group B respectively) and infection period (26.3 ± 11.6h in group A and 24.9 ± 13.8h in group B respectively) in group B. Meanwhile, in group B, the wound healing time was shorter than group A statistically in both taintless cases (9.12 ± 1.30 d in group A and 6.57 ± 0.49 d in group B respectively) and infected cases (14.24 ± 2.63 d in group A and 10.65 ± 1.69 d in group B respectively).

Conclusion: The facial laceration of dog bite wounds should be primary closed immediately after formal and thoroughly debridement. And the primary closure would shorten the healing time of the dog bite wounds without increasing the rate and period of infection. There is no potentiality of increasing infection incidence and infection speed, compared immediate primary closure with the wounds left open. On the contrary, primary closure the wounds can promote its primary healing. Prophylactic antibiotics administration was not recommended. and the important facial organ or tissue injuries should be secondary reconditioned.

Citing Articles

Age group analysis of patients with dog bite injuries who visited a single regional emergency medical center and factors affecting wound infections.

Kang D, Choi J, Choi W, Jang J, Cho J, Hyun S J Trauma Inj. 2024; 35(2):84-91.

PMID: 39381177 PMC: 11309181. DOI: 10.20408/jti.2021.0046.


Management Strategies for Common Animal Bites in Pediatrics: A Narrative Review on the Latest Progress.

Septelici D, Carbone G, Cipri A, Esposito S Microorganisms. 2024; 12(5).

PMID: 38792754 PMC: 11124134. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12050924.


A Comparative Analysis of Prophylactic Antibiotic Administration in Emergency Surgery Versus Elective Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.

Meretsky C, Krumbach B, Schiuma A Cureus. 2024; 16(3):e57338.

PMID: 38690454 PMC: 11060617. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57338.


Clinical effect analysis of using medical glue versus conventional suturing to treat dog bite in children's maxillofacial region after negative pressure sealing drainage: A randomized trial.

Lisong H, Lianfu W, Jinhong Y, Haibin Z Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 102(37):e34837.

PMID: 37713853 PMC: 10508562. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034837.


Surgical management of facial dog bite trauma: A contemporary perspective and review.

Chen T, Karim M, Grace Z, Magdich A, Carniol E, Benson B World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023; 9(2):123-130.

PMID: 37383329 PMC: 10296040. DOI: 10.1002/wjo2.75.


References
1.
Smith M, Walker A, Brenchley J . Barking up the wrong tree? A survey of dog bite wound management. Emerg Med J. 2003; 20(3):253-5. PMC: 1726116. DOI: 10.1136/emj.20.3.253. View

2.
Capellan O, Hollander J . Management of lacerations in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2003; 21(1):205-31. DOI: 10.1016/s0733-8627(02)00087-1. View

3.
Maimaris C, Quinton D . Dog-bite lacerations: a controlled trial of primary wound closure. Arch Emerg Med. 1988; 5(3):156-61. PMC: 1285519. DOI: 10.1136/emj.5.3.156. View

4.
Talan D, Citron D, Abrahamian F, Moran G, Goldstein E . Bacteriologic analysis of infected dog and cat bites. Emergency Medicine Animal Bite Infection Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340(2):85-92. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199901143400202. View

5.
Stefanopoulos P, Tarantzopoulou A . Facial bite wounds: management update. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 34(5):464-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2005.04.001. View