HIV-HBV Coinfection in Southern Africa and the Effect of Lamivudine- Versus Tenofovir-containing CART on HBV Outcomes
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: This study assessed HIV-hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfection in southern Africa in terms of prevalence, viral characteristics, occult HBV, and the effect of lamivudine- versus tenofovir-containing first-line combination antiretroviral treatment (cART) on HBV-related outcomes.
Methods: A multicenter prospective cohort of HIV-infected adults in Zambia and South Africa who initiated cART. Outcomes by month 12 on cART were immunological recovery, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss, viral suppression, and drug resistance. We used descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and linear mixed models.
Results: Of the 1087 participants, 92 were HBsAg seropositive, yielding a sample-weighted prevalence of 7.4% (95% confidence interval: 5.6 to 9.2), with 76% genotype HBV-A1. The estimated CD4 recovery on cART was similar between HIV monoinfection and HIV-HBV coinfection groups and between lamivudine- and tenofovir-treated participants. HBsAg loss was documented in 20% (4/20) of lamivudine-treated and 18% (3/17) of tenofovir-treated participants (P = 0.305). Viral suppression (HBV-DNA < 20 IU/mL) was achieved in 61.5% (16/26) of lamivudine-treated and 71.4% (15/21) of tenofovir-treated participants (P = 0.477). HBV pol sequencing demonstrated M204I (n = 3) and N236T (n = 1) resistance-associated mutations in 4 of 8 (50%) lamivudine-treated participants and none in tenofovir-treated participants. Occult HBV infection was present in 13.3% before cART, but by month 12, HBV-DNA was below the limit of detection (<15 IU/mL) in 90.5% (19/21) of lamivudine-treated and 100% (18/18) of tenofovir-treated participants (P = 0.179).
Conclusions: Tenofovir-containing first-line cART is preferred for HIV-HBV coinfection in Africa because of a superior resistance profile relative to lamivudine monotherapy. Extended follow-up will be needed to determine long-term complications of occult HBV coinfection. Improved access to HBsAg screening and tenofovir is needed.
Phinius B, Anderson M, Gobe I, Mokomane M, Choga W, Phakedi B Viruses. 2024; 16(4).
PMID: 38675933 PMC: 11054684. DOI: 10.3390/v16040592.
Zhang Q, Wang H, Jin Y, Zhou N, Sun L, Wu H Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023; 13:1130485.
PMID: 36844414 PMC: 9944431. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1130485.
Epidemiology of occult hepatitis B and C in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ndzie Ondigui J, Kenmoe S, Kengne-Nde C, Ebogo-Belobo J, Takuissu G, Kenfack-Momo R J Infect Public Health. 2022; 15(12):1436-1445.
PMID: 36395668 PMC: 7613883. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.11.008.
Hepatitis B Virus Research in South Africa.
Maepa M, Ely A, Kramvis A, Bloom K, Naidoo K, Simani O Viruses. 2022; 14(9).
PMID: 36146747 PMC: 9503375. DOI: 10.3390/v14091939.
Wu S, Yi W, Gao Y, Deng W, Bi X, Lin Y Front Immunol. 2022; 13:893512.
PMID: 35634301 PMC: 9130599. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.893512.