» Articles » PMID: 23891081

Relationship Between Intracortical Electrode Design and Chronic Recording Function

Overview
Journal Biomaterials
Date 2013 Jul 30
PMID 23891081
Citations 101
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intracortical electrodes record neural signals directly from local populations of neurons in the brain, and conduct them to external electronics that control prosthetics. However, the relationship between electrode design, defined by shape, size and tethering; and long-term (chronic) stability of the neuron-electrode interface is poorly understood. Here, we studied the effects of various commercially available intracortical electrode designs that vary in shape (cylindrical, planar), size (15 μm, 50 μm and 75 μm), and tethering [electrode connections to connector with (tethered) and without tethering cable (untethered)] using histological, transcriptomic, and electrophysiological analyses over acute (3 day) and chronic (12 week) timepoints. Quantitative analysis of histological sections indicated that Michigan 50 μm (M50) and Michigan tethered (MT) electrodes induced significantly (p < 0.01) higher glial scarring, and lesser survival of neurons in regions of blood-brain barrier (BBB) breach when compared to microwire (MW) and Michigan 15 μm (M15) electrodes acutely and chronically. Gene expression analysis of the neurotoxic cytokines interleukin (Il)1 (Il1α, Il1β), Il6, Il17 (Il17a, Il17b, Il17f), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (Tnf) indicated that MW electrodes induced significantly (p < 0.05) reduced expression of these transcripts when compared to M15, M50 and FMAA electrodes chronically. Finally, electrophysiological assessment of electrode function indicated that MW electrodes performed significantly (p < 0.05) better than all other electrodes over a period of 12 weeks. These studies reveal that intracortical electrodes with smaller size, cylindrical shape, and without tethering cables produce significantly diminished inflammatory responses when compared to large, planar and tethered electrodes. These studies provide a platform for the rational design and assessment of chronically functional intracortical electrode implants in the future.

Citing Articles

Enhancing biocompatibility of the brain-machine interface: A review.

Villa J, Cury J, Kessler L, Tan X, Richter C Bioact Mater. 2024; 42:531-549.

PMID: 39308547 PMC: 11416625. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.08.034.


Design, Fabrication, and Implantation of Invasive Microelectrode Arrays as in vivo Brain Machine Interfaces: A Comprehensive Review.

Yi D, Yao Y, Wang Y, Chen L J Manuf Process. 2024; 126:185-207.

PMID: 39185373 PMC: 11340637. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.07.100.


Glial scarring around intra-cortical MEA implants with flexible and free microwires inserted using biodegradable PLGA needles.

Darlot F, Villard P, Salam L, Rousseau L, Piret G Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1408088.

PMID: 39104630 PMC: 11298340. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1408088.


Months-long tracking of neuronal ensembles spanning multiple brain areas with Ultra-Flexible Tentacle Electrodes.

Yasar T, Gombkoto P, Vyssotski A, Vavladeli A, Lewis C, Wu B Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):4822.

PMID: 38844769 PMC: 11156863. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-49226-9.


Harnessing the Stem Cell Niche in Regenerative Medicine: Innovative Avenue to Combat Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Velikic G, Maric D, Maric D, Supic G, Puletic M, Dulic O Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(2).

PMID: 38256066 PMC: 10816024. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25020993.