» Articles » PMID: 23847556

Grammatical Aspect and Temporal Distance in Motion Descriptions

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2013 Jul 13
PMID 23847556
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Grammatical aspect is known to shape event understanding. However, little is known about how it interacts with other important temporal information, such as recent and distant past. The current work uses computer-mouse tracking (Spivey et al., 2005) to explore the interaction of aspect and temporal context. Participants in our experiment listened to past motion event descriptions that varied according to aspect (simple past, past progressive) and temporal distance (recent past, distant past) while viewing scenes with paths and implied destinations. Participants used a computer mouse to place characters into the scene to match event descriptions. Our results indicated that aspect and temporal context interact in interesting ways. When aspect placed emphasis on the ongoing details of the event and the temporal context was recent (thus, making fine details available in memory), this match between conditions elicited smoother and faster computer mouse movements than when conditions mismatched. Likewise, when aspect placed emphasis on the less-detailed end state of the event and temporal context was in the distant past (thus making fine details less available), this match between conditions also elicited smoother and faster computer mouse movements.

Citing Articles

Fine-grained time course of verb aspect processing.

Minor S, Mitrofanova N, Ramchand G PLoS One. 2022; 17(2):e0264132.

PMID: 35213616 PMC: 8880397. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264132.


Computer mouse tracking reveals motor signatures in a cognitive task of spatial language grounding.

Lins J, Schoner G Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019; 81(7):2424-2460.

PMID: 31515771 PMC: 6848251. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01847-9.


'Right Now, Sophie (∗)Swims in the Pool?!': Brain Potentials of Grammatical Aspect Processing.

Flecken M, Walbert K, Dijkstra T Front Psychol. 2015; 6:1764.

PMID: 26635673 PMC: 4655232. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01764.


Understanding How Grammatical Aspect Influences Legal Judgment.

Sherrill A, Eerland A, Zwaan R, Magliano J PLoS One. 2015; 10(10):e0141181.

PMID: 26496364 PMC: 4619717. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141181.


Eye movements during listening reveal spontaneous grammatical processing.

Huette S, Winter B, Matlock T, Ardell D, Spivey M Front Psychol. 2014; 5:410.

PMID: 24904450 PMC: 4033228. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00410.


References
1.
Calvo-Merino B, Grezes J, Glaser D, Passingham R, Haggard P . Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Curr Biol. 2006; 16(19):1905-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.065. View

2.
Gallese V, Lakoff G . The Brain's concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2010; 22(3):455-79. DOI: 10.1080/02643290442000310. View

3.
Song J, Nakayama K . Role of focal attention on latencies and trajectories of visually guided manual pointing. J Vis. 2006; 6(9):982-95. DOI: 10.1167/6.9.11. View

4.
Boulenger V, Roy A, Paulignan Y, Deprez V, Jeannerod M, Nazir T . Cross-talk between language processes and overt motor behavior in the first 200 msec of processing. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006; 18(10):1607-15. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1607. View

5.
Ferretti T, Kutas M, McRae K . Verb aspect and the activation of event knowledge. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007; 33(1):182-96. PMC: 3228359. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.182. View