» Articles » PMID: 23836170

Genetic Basis for in Vitro and in Vivo Resistance to Lincosamides, Streptogramins A, and Pleuromutilins (LSAP Phenotype) in Enterococcus Faecium

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2013 Jul 10
PMID 23836170
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

As opposed to Enterococcus faecalis, which is intrinsically resistant to lincosamides, streptogramins A, and pleuromutilins (LSAP phenotype) by production of the ABC protein Lsa(A), Enterococcus faecium is naturally susceptible. Since this phenotype may be selected for in vivo by quinupristin-dalfopristin (Q-D), the aim of this study was to investigate the molecular mechanism of acquired LSAP resistance in E. faecium. Six LSAP-resistant in vitro mutants of E. faecium HM1070 as well as three different pairs of clinical isolates (pre- and postexposure to Q-D) were studied. The full genome sequence of an in vitro mutant (E. faecium UCN90B) was determined by using 454 sequencing technology and was compared with that of the parental strain. Single-nucleotide replacement was carried out to confirm the role of this mutation. By comparative genomic analysis, a point mutation was found within a 1,503-bp gene coding for an ABC homologue showing 66% amino acid identity with Lsa(A). This mutation (C1349T) led to an amino acid substitution (Thr450Ile). An identical mutation was identified in all in vitro and in vivo resistant strains but was not present in susceptible strains. The wild-type allele was named eat(A) (for Enterococcus ABC transporter), and its mutated allelic variant was named eat(A)v. The introduction of eat(A)v from UCN90B into HM1070 conferred the LSAP phenotype, whereas that of eat(A) from HM1070 into UCN90B restored susceptibility entirely. This is the first description of the molecular mechanism of acquired LSAP resistance in E. faecium. Characterization of the biochemical mechanism of resistance and the physiological role of this ABC protein need further investigations.

Citing Articles

CRISPR-Cas Systems in the Fight Against Antimicrobial Resistance: Current Status, Potentials, and Future Directions.

Ahmed M, Kayode H, Okesanya O, Ukoaka B, Eshun G, Mourid M Infect Drug Resist. 2024; 17:5229-5245.

PMID: 39619730 PMC: 11608035. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S494327.


Investigating antimicrobial resistance genes in probiotic products for companion animals.

Kerek A, Szabo E, Szabo A, Papp M, Banyai K, Kardos G Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1464351.

PMID: 39502950 PMC: 11534615. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1464351.


Genome-based taxonomic identification and safety assessment of an Enterococcus strain isolated from a homemade dairy product.

Kim Y, Lee D, Seo H, Eun S, Lee D, Choi Y Int Microbiol. 2024; 27(5):1513-1525.

PMID: 38466360 DOI: 10.1007/s10123-024-00496-9.


Non- non- enterococci: a review of clinical manifestations, virulence factors, and antimicrobial resistance.

Mullally C, Fahriani M, Mowlaboccus S, Coombs G Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024; 37(2):e0012123.

PMID: 38466110 PMC: 11237509. DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00121-23.


Phylogeny, Virulence, and Antimicrobial Resistance Gene Profiles of Isolated from Australian Feedlot Cattle and Their Significance to Public and Environmental Health.

Messele Y, Trott D, Hasoon M, Veltman T, McMeniman J, Kidd S Antibiotics (Basel). 2023; 12(7).

PMID: 37508218 PMC: 10376260. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12071122.


References
1.
Davidson A, Dassa E, Orelle C, Chen J . Structure, function, and evolution of bacterial ATP-binding cassette systems. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2008; 72(2):317-64, table of contents. PMC: 2415747. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00031-07. View

2.
Malbruny B, Werno A, Anderson T, Murdoch D, Leclercq R . A new phenotype of resistance to lincosamide and streptogramin A-type antibiotics in Streptococcus agalactiae in New Zealand. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004; 54(6):1040-4. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkh493. View

3.
Kehrenberg C, Aarestrup F, Schwarz S . IS21-558 insertion sequences are involved in the mobility of the multiresistance gene cfr. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006; 51(2):483-7. PMC: 1797725. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01340-06. View

4.
Kwak J, Choi E, Weisblum B . Transcriptional attenuation control of ermK, a macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance determinant from Bacillus licheniformis. J Bacteriol. 1991; 173(15):4725-35. PMC: 208150. DOI: 10.1128/jb.173.15.4725-4735.1991. View

5.
Singh K, Murray B . Differences in the Enterococcus faecalis lsa locus that influence susceptibility to quinupristin-dalfopristin and clindamycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004; 49(1):32-9. PMC: 538898. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.49.1.32-39.2005. View