» Articles » PMID: 23810714

Tool Manipulation Knowledge is Retrieved by Way of the Ventral Visual Object Processing Pathway

Overview
Journal Cortex
Date 2013 Jul 2
PMID 23810714
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), we find that object manipulation knowledge is accessed by way of the ventral object processing pathway. We exploit the fact that parvocellular channels project to the ventral but not the dorsal stream, and show that increased neural responses for tool stimuli are observed in the inferior parietal lobule when those stimuli are visible only to the ventral object processing stream. In a control condition, tool-preferences were observed in a superior and posterior parietal region for stimuli titrated so as to be visible by the dorsal visual pathway. Functional connectivity analyses confirm the dissociation between sub-regions of parietal cortex according to whether their principal afferent input is via the ventral or dorsal visual pathway. These results challenge the 'Embodied Hypothesis of Tool Recognition', according to which tool identification critically depends on simulation of object manipulation knowledge. Instead, these data indicate that retrieval of object-associated manipulation knowledge is contingent on accessing the identity of the object, a process that is subserved by the ventral visual pathway.

Citing Articles

Apraxia Rehabilitation Using Gesture Training and Sequencing Tasks: A Case Report.

Eguchi T, Takashiba J, Morioka S Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e77115.

PMID: 39925578 PMC: 11805599. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.77115.


Reciprocal interactions among parietal and occipito-temporal representations support everyday object-directed actions.

Mahon B, Almeida J Neuropsychologia. 2024; 198:108841.

PMID: 38430962 PMC: 11498102. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108841.


Temporal differences and commonalities between hand and tool neural processing.

Amaral L, Besson G, Caparelli-Daquer E, Bergstrom F, Almeida J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):22270.

PMID: 38097608 PMC: 10721913. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-48180-8.


Neural and behavioral signatures of the multidimensionality of manipulable object processing.

Almeida J, Fracasso A, Kristensen S, Valerio D, Bergstrom F, Chakravarthi R Commun Biol. 2023; 6(1):940.

PMID: 37709924 PMC: 10502059. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05323-x.


Mechanisms and neuroanatomy of response selection in tool and non-tool action tasks: Evidence from left-hemisphere stroke.

Garcea F, Buxbaum L Cortex. 2023; 167:335-350.

PMID: 37598647 PMC: 10543550. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.06.012.


References
1.
Sincich L, Park K, Wohlgemuth M, Horton J . Bypassing V1: a direct geniculate input to area MT. Nat Neurosci. 2004; 7(10):1123-8. DOI: 10.1038/nn1318. View

2.
Moreaud O, Charnallet A, Pellat J . Identification without manipulation: a study of the relations between object use and semantic memory. Neuropsychologia. 1998; 36(12):1295-301. DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00034-7. View

3.
Fang F, He S . Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways. Nat Neurosci. 2005; 8(10):1380-5. DOI: 10.1038/nn1537. View

4.
Ishibashi R, Lambon Ralph M, Saito S, Pobric G . Different roles of lateral anterior temporal lobe and inferior parietal lobule in coding function and manipulation tool knowledge: evidence from an rTMS study. Neuropsychologia. 2011; 49(5):1128-1135. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.01.004. View

5.
Grill-Spector K, Kourtzi Z, Kanwisher N . The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition. Vision Res. 2001; 41(10-11):1409-22. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00073-6. View