» Articles » PMID: 23805171

ApoStream(™), a New Dielectrophoretic Device for Antibody Independent Isolation and Recovery of Viable Cancer Cells from Blood

Overview
Date 2013 Jun 28
PMID 23805171
Citations 160
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Isolation and enumeration of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are used to monitor metastatic disease progression and guide cancer therapy. However, currently available technologies are limited to cells expressing specific cell surface markers, such as epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) or have limited specificity because they are based on cell size alone. We developed a device, ApoStream(™) that overcomes these limitations by exploiting differences in the biophysical characteristics between cancer cells and normal, healthy blood cells to capture CTCs using dielectrophoretic technology in a microfluidic flow chamber. Further, the system overcomes throughput limitations by operating in continuous mode for efficient isolation and enrichment of CTCs from blood. The performance of the device was optimized using a design of experiment approach for key operating parameters such as frequency, voltage and flow rates, and buffer formulations. Cell spiking studies were conducted using SKOV3 or MDA-MB-231 cell lines that have a high and low expression level of EpCAM, respectively, to demonstrate linearity and precision of recovery independent of EpCAM receptor levels. The average recovery of SKOV3 and MDA-MB-231 cancer cells spiked into approximately 12 × 10(6) peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained from 7.5 ml normal human donor blood was 75.4% ± 3.1% (n = 12) and 71.2% ± 1.6% (n = 6), respectively. The intra-day and inter-day precision coefficients of variation of the device were both less than 3%. Linear regression analysis yielded a correlation coefficient (R(2)) of more than 0.99 for a spiking range of 4-2600 cells. The viability of MDA-MB-231 cancer cells captured with ApoStream was greater than 97.1% and there was no difference in cell growth up to 7 days in culture compared to controls. The ApoStream device demonstrated high precision and linearity of recovery of viable cancer cells independent of their EpCAM expression level. Isolation and enrichment of viable cancer cells from ApoStream enables molecular characterization of CTCs from a wide range of cancer types.

Citing Articles

Multifaceted Approaches in Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-Mediated Circulating Tumor Cell Isolation.

Szerenyi D, Jarvas G, Guttman A Molecules. 2025; 30(5).

PMID: 40076201 PMC: 11901967. DOI: 10.3390/molecules30050976.


Microfluidics engineering towards personalized oncology-a review.

Mishra S, Kumarasamy M In Vitro Model. 2025; 2(3-4):69-81.

PMID: 39871996 PMC: 11756504. DOI: 10.1007/s44164-023-00054-z.


Detection of Cancer Stem Cells from Patient Samples.

Hakala S, Hamalainen A, Sandelin S, Giannareas N, Narva E Cells. 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 39851576 PMC: 11764358. DOI: 10.3390/cells14020148.


Two-Step Acoustic Cell Separation Based on Cell Size and Acoustic Impedance─toward Isolation of Viable Circulating Tumor Cells.

Magnusson C, Rezayati Charan M, Augustsson P Anal Chem. 2025; 97(4):2120-2126.

PMID: 39818757 PMC: 11800186. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04911.


Current biological implications and clinical relevance of metastatic circulating tumor cells.

Shahhosseini R, Pakmehr S, Elhami A, Shakir M, Alzahrani A, Al-Hamdani M Clin Exp Med. 2024; 25(1):7.

PMID: 39546080 PMC: 11567993. DOI: 10.1007/s10238-024-01518-6.


References
1.
Budd G, Cristofanilli M, Ellis M, Stopeck A, Borden E, Miller M . Circulating tumor cells versus imaging--predicting overall survival in metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006; 12(21):6403-9. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1769. View

2.
Moon H, Kwon K, Kim S, Han H, Sohn J, Lee S . Continuous separation of breast cancer cells from blood samples using multi-orifice flow fractionation (MOFF) and dielectrophoresis (DEP). Lab Chip. 2011; 11(6):1118-25. DOI: 10.1039/c0lc00345j. View

3.
Sabuncu A, Liu J, Beebe S, Beskok A . Dielectrophoretic separation of mouse melanoma clones. Biomicrofluidics. 2010; 4(2). PMC: 2917886. DOI: 10.1063/1.3447702. View

4.
Salmanzadeh A, Kittur H, Sano M, Roberts P, Schmelz E, Davalos R . Dielectrophoretic differentiation of mouse ovarian surface epithelial cells, macrophages, and fibroblasts using contactless dielectrophoresis. Biomicrofluidics. 2012; 6(2):24104-2410413. PMC: 3331864. DOI: 10.1063/1.3699973. View

5.
Markx G, Pethig R . Dielectrophoretic separation of cells: Continuous separation. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1995; 45(4):337-43. DOI: 10.1002/bit.260450408. View