» Articles » PMID: 23791129

Competitive Advantage of PET/MRI

Overview
Journal Eur J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2013 Jun 25
PMID 23791129
Citations 55
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Multimodality imaging has made great strides in the imaging evaluation of patients with a variety of diseases. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is now established as the imaging modality of choice in many clinical conditions, particularly in oncology. While the initial development of combined PET/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) was in the preclinical arena, hybrid PET/MR scanners are now available for clinical use. PET/MRI combines the unique features of MRI including excellent soft tissue contrast, diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, fMRI and other specialized sequences as well as MR spectroscopy with the quantitative physiologic information that is provided by PET. Most evidence for the potential clinical utility of PET/MRI is based on studies performed with side-by-side comparison or software-fused MRI and PET images. Data on distinctive utility of hybrid PET/MRI are rapidly emerging. There are potential competitive advantages of PET/MRI over PET/CT. In general, PET/MRI may be preferred over PET/CT where the unique features of MRI provide more robust imaging evaluation in certain clinical settings. The exact role and potential utility of simultaneous data acquisition in specific research and clinical settings will need to be defined. It may be that simultaneous PET/MRI will be best suited for clinical situations that are disease-specific, organ-specific, related to diseases of the children or in those patients undergoing repeated imaging for whom cumulative radiation dose must be kept as low as reasonably achievable. PET/MRI also offers interesting opportunities for use of dual modality probes. Upon clear definition of clinical utility, other important and practical issues related to business operational model, clinical workflow and reimbursement will also be resolved.

Citing Articles

Clinical and Deep-Learned Evaluation of MR-Guided Self-Supervised PET Reconstruction.

Hopson J, Ellis S, Flaus A, McGinnity C, Neji R, Reader A IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2025; :1.

PMID: 40008384 PMC: 7617360. DOI: 10.1109/TRPMS.2024.3496779.


Occult breast cancer in an older woman: A case report.

Liu C, Xing H Exp Ther Med. 2025; 29(2):38.

PMID: 39781192 PMC: 11707571. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2024.12788.


Theranostics: a multifaceted approach utilizing nano-biomaterials.

Yasir M, Mishra R, Tripathi A, Maurya R, Shahi A, Zaki M Discov Nano. 2024; 19(1):35.

PMID: 38407670 PMC: 10897124. DOI: 10.1186/s11671-024-03979-w.


Study on the radiofrequency transparency of partial-ring oval-shaped prototype PET inserts in a 3 T clinical MRI system.

Akram M, Levin C, Nishikido F, Takyu S, Obata T, Yamaya T Radiol Phys Technol. 2023; 17(1):60-70.

PMID: 37874462 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-023-00747-w.


Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of F18-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography, Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion, and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Differentiation between Recurrence of a High-grade Glioma and Radiation....

Peer S, Gopinath R, Saini J, Kumar P, Srinivas D, Nagaraj C Indian J Nucl Med. 2023; 38(2):115-124.

PMID: 37456178 PMC: 10348492. DOI: 10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_73_22.


References
1.
Tewfik J, Greene G . Fluorine-18-deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography imaging with magnetic resonance and computed tomographic correlation in the evaluation of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas: a pictorial essay. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2008; 37(4):178-88. DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2007.10.005. View

2.
Tatsumi M, Yamamoto S, Imaizumi M, Watabe T, Kanai Y, Aoki M . Simultaneous PET/MR body imaging in rats: initial experiences with an integrated PET/MRI scanner. Ann Nucl Med. 2012; 26(5):444-9. DOI: 10.1007/s12149-012-0581-8. View

3.
Fahey F, Treves S, Adelstein S . Minimizing and communicating radiation risk in pediatric nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med. 2011; 52(8):1240-51. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.069609. View

4.
Hofmann M, Pichler B, Scholkopf B, Beyer T . Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008; 36 Suppl 1:S93-104. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-008-1007-7. View

5.
Blodgett T, Fukui M, Snyderman C, Branstetter 4th B, McCook B, Townsend D . Combined PET-CT in the head and neck: part 1. Physiologic, altered physiologic, and artifactual FDG uptake. Radiographics. 2005; 25(4):897-912. DOI: 10.1148/rg.254035156. View