» Articles » PMID: 22419751

Introducing Parametric Fusion PET/MRI of Primary Prostate Cancer

Overview
Journal J Nucl Med
Specialty Nuclear Medicine
Date 2012 Mar 16
PMID 22419751
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: We assessed the performance of parametric fusion PET/MRI based on (11)C-choline PET/CT and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps derived from diffusion-weighted MRI for the identification of primary prostate cancer.

Methods: (11)C-choline PET/CT and MRI were performed in 17 patients with untreated primary prostate cancer, followed by prostatectomy. Registration of in vivo imaging with histology was achieved using a mutual-information objective function and by performing ex vivo MRI of the prostatectomy specimen (obtained at 3 T) and whole-mount sectioning with block-face photography as intermediate steps. Data analysis included volumetrically registered whole-mount histology with Gleason scoring, (11)C-choline, and ADC data (obtained at 1.5 T). Volumes of interest were defined on the basis of histologically proven tumor tissue to calculate tumor-to-benign prostate background ratios (TBRs) for (11)C-choline, ADC, and a derived fusion PET/MRI parameter calculating the quotient of (11)C-choline over ADC (P(CHOL/ADC)).

Results: Fifty-one tumor nodules were identified at pathology. The TBRs for (11)C-choline (P < 0.05) and P(CHOL/ADC) (P < 0.005) were significantly higher in prostate cancers with a Gleason score of ≥3 + 4 than with a Gleason score of ≤3 + 3 disease and controls. For Gleason ≥ 3 + 4, the ADC TBRs were significantly lower than controls and Gleason ≤ 3 + 3 disease (P < 0.05). The absolute value of TBRs obtained from Gleason ≥ 3 + 4 cancers increased from ADC to (11)C-choline PET/CT and from (11)C-choline PET/CT to P(CHOL/ADC), with each step being statistically significant.

Conclusion: Our data indicate that parametric PET/MRI using P(CHOL/ADC) improves lesion-to-background contrast (TBRs) of Gleason ≥ 3 + 4 disease, compared with (11)C-choline PET/CT or diffusion-weighted MRI, and thus hold promise that parametric imaging performed on hybrid PET/MRI may further improve identification and localization of significant primary prostate cancer.

Citing Articles

Magnetic Fields and Cancer: Epidemiology, Cellular Biology, and Theranostics.

Maffei M Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(3).

PMID: 35163262 PMC: 8835851. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031339.


MRI/PET Imaging in elevated PSA and localized prostate cancer: a narrative review.

Regmi S, Sathianathen N, Stout T, Konety B Transl Androl Urol. 2021; 10(7):3117-3129.

PMID: 34430415 PMC: 8350235. DOI: 10.21037/tau-21-374.


The impact of the co-registration technique and analysis methodology in comparison studies between advanced imaging modalities and whole-mount-histology reference in primary prostate cancer.

Zamboglou C, Kramer M, Kiefer S, Bronsert P, Ceci L, Sigle A Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):5836.

PMID: 33712662 PMC: 7954803. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85028-5.


Contrast-enhanced dual mode imaging: photoacoustic imaging plus more.

Park S, Jung U, Lee S, Lee D, Kim C Biomed Eng Lett. 2019; 7(2):121-133.

PMID: 30603159 PMC: 6208466. DOI: 10.1007/s13534-016-0006-z.


Comparison of PET/CT and whole-mount histopathology sections of the human prostate: a new strategy for voxel-wise evaluation.

Schiller F, Fechter T, Zamboglou C, Chirindel A, Salman N, Jilg C EJNMMI Phys. 2017; 4(1):21.

PMID: 28815472 PMC: 5559412. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-017-0188-1.


References
1.
Katahira K, Takahara T, Kwee T, Oda S, Suzuki Y, Morishita S . Ultra-high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the detection of prostate cancer: evaluation in 201 cases with histopathological correlation. Eur Radiol. 2010; 21(1):188-96. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1883-7. View

2.
Shah R, Bassily N, Wei J, Mucci N, Montie J, Sanda M . Benign prostatic glands at surgical margins of radical prostatectomy specimens: frequency and associated risk factors. Urology. 2000; 56(5):721-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00775-5. View

3.
Ruf J, Hanninen E, Bohmig M, Koch I, Denecke T, Plotkin M . Impact of FDG-PET/MRI image fusion on the detection of pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology. 2006; 6(6):512-9. DOI: 10.1159/000096993. View

4.
Kim C, Park B, Han J, Kang T, Lee H . Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate at 3 T for differentiation of malignant and benign tissue in transition and peripheral zones: preliminary results. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007; 31(3):449-54. DOI: 10.1097/01.rct.0000243456.00437.59. View

5.
Hara T, Kosaka N, Kishi H . PET imaging of prostate cancer using carbon-11-choline. J Nucl Med. 1998; 39(6):990-5. View