» Articles » PMID: 23778366

Complications After Surgery for Lumbar Stenosis in a Veteran Population

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2013 Jun 20
PMID 23778366
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Secondary analysis of the prospectively collected Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

Objective: Determine rates of major medical complications, wound complications, and mortality among patients undergoing surgery for lumbar stenosis and examine risk factors for these complications.

Summary Of Background Data: Surgery for spinal stenosis is concentrated among older adults, in whom complications are more frequent than among middle-aged patients. Many studies have focused on infections or device complications, but fewer studies have focused on major cardiopulmonary complications, using prospectively collected data.

Methods: We identified patients who underwent surgery for a primary diagnosis of lumbar stenosis between 1998 and 2009 from the Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. We created a composite of major medical complications, including acute myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, systemic sepsis, coma, and cardiac arrest.

Results: Among 12,154 eligible patients, major medical complications occurred in 2.1%, wound complications in 3.2%, and 90-day mortality in 0.6%. Major medical complications, but not wound complications, were strongly associated with age. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class was a strong predictor of complications. Insulin use, long-term corticosteroid use, and preoperative functional status were also significant predictors. Fusion procedures were associated with higher complication rates than with decompression alone. In logistic regressions, ASA class and age were the strongest predictors of major medical complications (odds ratio for ASA class 4 vs. class 1 or 2: 2.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.68-5.25; P = 0.0002). After adjustment for comorbidity, age, and functional status, fusion procedures remained associated with higher medical complication rates than were decompressions alone (odds ratio = 2.85; 95% confidence interval, 2.14-3.78; P < 0.0001).

Conclusion: ASA class, age, type of surgery, insulin or corticosteroid use, and functional status were independent risk factors for major medical complications. These factors may help in selecting patients and planning procedures, improving patient safety.

Citing Articles

The effect of high-normal preoperative international normalized ratios on postoperative outcomes and complications following posterior cervical spine surgery.

Strony J, Sabbagh R, Ahn J, Du J, Ahn U, Ahn N J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):552.

PMID: 39252112 PMC: 11382497. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05009-y.


Postoperative complications after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis, assessment using two different data sources.

Alhaug O, Dolatowski F, Kaur S, Lonne G Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024; 166(1):189.

PMID: 38653826 PMC: 11039491. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-024-06086-y.


The Essence of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, 2021: 5. Postoperative Prognosis.

Sekiguchi M Spine Surg Relat Res. 2023; 7(4):314-318.

PMID: 37636153 PMC: 10447196. DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.2022-0082.


Surgical trends and regional variation in Danish patients diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis between 2002 and 2018: a retrospective registry-based study of 83,783 patients.

Jensen R, Skovsgaard C, Ziegler D, Schiottz-Christensen B, Mieritz R, Andresen A BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):665.

PMID: 37340411 PMC: 10283336. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09638-7.


Predictors of Complications and Unfavorable Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery Treatment in Elderly Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spine Pathologies (Case Series).

Klimov V, Evsyukov A, Amelina E, Ryabykh S, Simonovich A Front Surg. 2022; 9:869345.

PMID: 35558384 PMC: 9086490. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.869345.


References
1.
Schoenfeld A, Ochoa L, Bader J, Belmont Jr P . Risk factors for immediate postoperative complications and mortality following spine surgery: a study of 3475 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93(17):1577-82. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01048. View

2.
Mirza S, Deyo R, Heagerty P, Konodi M, Lee L, Turner J . Development of an index to characterize the "invasiveness" of spine surgery: validation by comparison to blood loss and operative time. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(24):2651-61. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818dad07. View

3.
Fritzell P, Hagg O, Nordwall A . Complications in lumbar fusion surgery for chronic low back pain: comparison of three surgical techniques used in a prospective randomized study. A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Eur Spine J. 2003; 12(2):178-89. PMC: 3784840. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-002-0493-8. View

4.
Rajaee S, Bae H, Kanim L, Delamarter R . Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 37(1):67-76. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820cccfb. View

5.
Veeravagu A, Patil C, Lad S, Boakye M . Risk factors for postoperative spinal wound infections after spinal decompression and fusion surgeries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(17):1869-72. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181adc989. View