» Articles » PMID: 23771574

The Carbon Monoxide Re-breathing Method Can Underestimate Hbmass Due to Incomplete Blood Mixing

Overview
Specialty Physiology
Date 2013 Jun 18
PMID 23771574
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Hemoglobin mass (Hbmass) is commonly assessed using the CO re-breathing method with the subject in the seated position. This may lead to an underestimation of Hbmass as blood in lower extremity veins while seated may not be tagged with carbon monoxide (CO) during the re-breathing period.

Methods: To test this hypothesis, CO re-breathing was performed on four occasions in nine male subjects, twice in the seated position and twice in combination with light cycle ergometer exercise (1 W/kg body-weight) intending to accelerate blood circulation and thereby potentially allowing for a better distribution of CO throughout the circulation as compared to in the seated position. Blood samples were drawn from an antecubital vein and the saphenous magna vein following the re-breathing procedure.

Results: In the seated position, CO re-breathing increased the percent carboxyhemoglobin (%HbCO) in the antecubital vein to 8.9 % (7.8-10.7) [median (min-max)], but less (P = 0.017) in the saphenous magna vein [7.8 % (5.0-9.9)]. With exercise, no differences in %HbCO were observed between sampling sites. As a result, CO re-breathing in combination with exercise revealed a ~3 % higher (P = 0.008) Hbmass, i.e., 936 g (757-1,018) as compared to 908 g (718-940) at seated rest.

Conclusion: This study suggests an uneven distribution of CO in the circulation if the CO re-breathing procedure is performed at rest in the seated position and therefore can underestimate Hbmass.

Citing Articles

Acute exposure to carbon monoxide inhalation and/or hot water immersion transiently increases erythropoietin in females but not in males.

DiMarco K, Chapman C, Weiser N, Matsell E, Lucernoni K, Chacon S Exp Physiol. 2024; 109(10):1782-1795.

PMID: 39143855 PMC: 11442759. DOI: 10.1113/EP091923.


The relationship between hemoglobin and [Formula: see text]: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Webb K, Gorman E, Morkeberg O, Klassen S, Regimbal R, Wiggins C PLoS One. 2023; 18(10):e0292835.

PMID: 37824583 PMC: 10569622. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292835.


Validity and reliability of capillary vs. Venous blood for the assessment of haemoglobin mass and intravascular volumes.

Royal J, Fisher J, Mlinar T, Mekjavic I, McDonnell A Front Physiol. 2022; 13:1021588.

PMID: 36505074 PMC: 9730879. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1021588.


A semi-automated device rapidly determine circulating blood volume in healthy males and carbon monoxide uptake kinetics of arterial and venous blood.

Andersen A, Baungaard S, Bejder J, Graae J, Hristovska A, Agerskov M J Clin Monit Comput. 2022; 37(2):437-447.

PMID: 36201093 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-022-00921-2.


Blood Volume, Hemoglobin Mass, and Peak Oxygen Uptake in Older Adults: The Generation 100 Study.

Lundgren K, Aspvik N, Langlo K, Braaten T, Wisloff U, Stensvold D Front Sports Act Living. 2021; 3:638139.

PMID: 33870187 PMC: 8048070. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2021.638139.


References
1.
Hopkins W . Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med. 2000; 30(1):1-15. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001. View

2.
Robach P, Schmitt L, Brugniaux J, Nicolet G, Duvallet A, Fouillot J . Living high-training low: effect on erythropoiesis and maximal aerobic performance in elite Nordic skiers. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006; 97(6):695-705. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-006-0240-7. View

3.
Schmidt W, Prommer N . The optimised CO-rebreathing method: a new tool to determine total haemoglobin mass routinely. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005; 95(5-6):486-95. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-005-0050-3. View

4.
. Recommended methods for measurement of red-cell and plasma volume: International Committee for Standardization in Haematology. J Nucl Med. 1980; 21(8):793-800. View

5.
Gore C, Hopkins W, Burge C . Errors of measurement for blood volume parameters: a meta-analysis. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005; 99(5):1745-58. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00505.2005. View