Conceptual Structure: Towards an Integrated Neuro-cognitive Account

Overview

Journal Lang Cogn Process

Specialty Psychology

Date 2013 Jun 11

PMID 23750064

Citations 25

Authors

K I Taylor

B J Devereux

L K Tyler

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

How are the meanings of concepts represented and processed? We present a cognitive model of conceptual representations and processing - the Conceptual Structure Account (CSA; Tyler & Moss, 2001) - as an example of a distributed, feature-based approach. In a first section, we describe the CSA and evaluate relevant neuropsychological and experimental behavioral data. We discuss studies using linguistic and non-linguistic stimuli, which are both presumed to access the same conceptual system. We then take the CSA as a framework for hypothesising how conceptual knowledge is represented and processed in the brain. This neuro-cognitive approach attempts to integrate the distributed feature-based characteristics of the CSA with a distributed and feature-based model of sensory object processing. Based on a review of relevant functional imaging and neuropsychological data, we argue that distributed accounts of feature-based representations have considerable explanatory power, and that a cognitive model of conceptual representations is needed to understand their neural bases.

Citing Articles

Better Together: Integrating Multivariate with Univariate Methods, and MEG with EEG to Study Language Comprehension.

Wang L, Kuperberg G Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2024; 39(8):991-1019.

PMID: 39444757 PMC: 11495849. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2023.2223783.

Explainable artificial intelligence (xAI) in neuromarketing/consumer neuroscience: an fMRI study on brand perception.

Marques Dos Santos J, Marques Dos Santos J Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1305164.

PMID: 38584851 PMC: 10995351. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1305164.

Recurrent connectivity supports higher-level visual and semantic object representations in the brain.

von Seth J, Nicholls V, Tyler L, Clarke A Commun Biol. 2023; 6(1):1207.

PMID: 38012301 PMC: 10682037. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05565-9.

AC-PLT: An algorithm for computer-assisted coding of semantic property listing data.

Ramos D, Moreno S, Canessa E, Chaigneau S, Marchant N Behav Res Methods. 2023; 56(4):3366-3379.

PMID: 37831369 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-023-02260-9.

No need to integrate action information during coarse semantic processing of man-made tools.

Yu W, Ni L, Zhang Z, Zheng W, Liu Y Psychon Bull Rev. 2023; 30(6):2230-2239.

PMID: 37221279 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02301-6.

References

Tanaka K . Neuronal mechanisms of object recognition. Science. 1993; 262(5134):685-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.8235589. View

Tootell R, Nelissen K, Vanduffel W, Orban G . Search for color 'center(s)' in macaque visual cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2004; 14(4):353-63. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhh001. View

McRae K, de Sa V, Seidenberg M . On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1997; 126(2):99-130. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.126.2.99. View

Barsalou L, Simmons W, Barbey A, Wilson C . Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003; 7(2):84-91. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)00029-3. View

Tyler L, Stamatakis E, Bright P, Acres K, Abdallah S, Rodd J . Processing objects at different levels of specificity. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004; 16(3):351-62. DOI: 10.1162/089892904322926692. View

Mahon B, Caramazza A . A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. J Physiol Paris. 2008; 102(1-3):59-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.004. View

Randall B, Moss H, Rodd J, Greer M, Tyler L . Distinctiveness and correlation in conceptual structure: behavioral and computational studies. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004; 30(2):393-406. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.393. View

Clarke A, Taylor K, Tyler L . The evolution of meaning: spatio-temporal dynamics of visual object recognition. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010; 23(8):1887-99. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21544. View

McRae K, Cree G, Seidenberg M, McNorgan C . Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behav Res Methods. 2006; 37(4):547-59. DOI: 10.3758/bf03192726. View

10.

Tyler L, Moss H, LEVY J . Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: a distributed account of category-specific deficits. Brain Lang. 2000; 75(2):195-231. DOI: 10.1006/brln.2000.2353. View

11.

Cree G, McRae K . Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003; 132(2):163-201. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.163. View

12.

Martin A . The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annu Rev Psychol. 2006; 58:25-45. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190143. View

13.

Martin A, Chao L . Semantic memory and the brain: structure and processes. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2001; 11(2):194-201. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00196-3. View

14.

Taylor K, Stamatakis E, Tyler L . Crossmodal integration of object features: voxel-based correlations in brain-damaged patients. Brain. 2009; 132(Pt 3):671-83. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awn361. View

15.

Barense M, Henson R, Lee A, Graham K . Medial temporal lobe activity during complex discrimination of faces, objects, and scenes: Effects of viewpoint. Hippocampus. 2009; 20(3):389-401. PMC: 2912509. DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20641. View

16.

Cree G, McNorgan C, McRae K . Distinctive features hold a privileged status in the computation of word meaning: Implications for theories of semantic memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006; 32(4):643-58. PMC: 3226832. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.643. View

17.

OToole A, Jiang F, Abdi H, Haxby J . Partially distributed representations of objects and faces in ventral temporal cortex. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005; 17(4):580-90. DOI: 10.1162/0898929053467550. View

18.

Taylor K, Salamoura A, Randall B, Moss H, Tyler L . Clarifying the nature of the distinctiveness by domain interaction in conceptual structure: comment on Cree, McNorgan, and McRae (2006). J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008; 34(3):719-25. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.719. View

19.

Warrington E, McCarthy R . Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain. 1987; 110 ( Pt 5):1273-96. DOI: 10.1093/brain/110.5.1273. View

20.

Tamura H, Kaneko H, Fujita I . Quantitative analysis of functional clustering of neurons in the macaque inferior temporal cortex. Neurosci Res. 2005; 52(4):311-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2005.04.006. View