» Articles » PMID: 23732657

Perceived 'healthiness' of Foods Can Influence Consumers' Estimations of Energy Density and Appropriate Portion Size

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2013 Jun 5
PMID 23732657
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare portion size (PS) estimates, perceived energy density (ED) and anticipated consumption guilt (ACG) for healthier vs standard foods.

Methods: Three pairs of isoenergy dense (kJ per 100 g) foods-healthier vs standard cereals, drinks and coleslaws-were selected. For each food, subjects served an appropriate PS for themselves and estimated its ED. Subjects also rated their ACG about eating the food on a scale of 1 (not at all guilty) to 5 (very guilty).

Results: Subjects (n=186) estimated larger portions of the healthier coleslaw than that of the standard version, and perceived all healthier foods to be lower in ED than their standard alternatives, despite being isoenergy dense. Higher ACG was associated with the standard foods. Portion estimates were generally larger than recommendations and the ED of the foods was underestimated.

Conclusions: The larger portions selected for the 'reduced fat' food in association with lower perceived ED and ACG suggests that such nutrition claims could be promoting inappropriate PS selection and consumption behaviour. Consumer education on appropriate portions is warranted to correct such misconceptions.

Citing Articles

Creation and validation of a NOVA scored picture set to evaluate ultra-processed foods.

Hutelin Z, Ahrens M, Baugh M, Oster M, Hanlon A, DiFeliceantonio A Appetite. 2024; 198:107358.

PMID: 38621591 PMC: 11092385. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107358.


Position statement on nutrition therapy for overweight and obesity: nutrition department of the Brazilian association for the study of obesity and metabolic syndrome (ABESO-2022).

Pepe R, Lottenberg A, Fujiwara C, Beyruti M, Cintra D, Machado R Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2023; 15(1):124.

PMID: 37296485 PMC: 10251611. DOI: 10.1186/s13098-023-01037-6.


Nutrition claims influence expectations about food attributes, attenuate activity in reward-associated brain regions during tasting, but do not impact pleasantness.

Rramani Q, Barakat Y, Jacob G, Ohla K, Lim S, Schicker D Brain Behav. 2022; 13(1):e2828.

PMID: 36511877 PMC: 9847625. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2828.


The Power of Suggestion: Subjective Satiety Is Affected by Nutrient and Health-Focused Food Labelling with No Effect on Physiological Gut Hormone Release.

Watson S, OHara H, Reveendran D, Cardwell C, Murphy K, Benson T Nutrients. 2022; 14(23).

PMID: 36501128 PMC: 9740488. DOI: 10.3390/nu14235100.


Quantifying differences in packaged food and drink purchases among households with diet-related cardiometabolic multi-morbidity: a cross-sectional analysis.

Ricket I, Brown J, MacKenzie T, Ma Y, Grewal D, Ailawadi K BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):2101.

PMID: 36397061 PMC: 9670385. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14626-3.


References
1.
Burger K, Fisher J, Johnson S . Mechanisms behind the portion size effect: visibility and bite size. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010; 19(3):546-51. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2010.233. View

2.
Diliberti N, Bordi P, Conklin M, Roe L, Rolls B . Increased portion size leads to increased energy intake in a restaurant meal. Obes Res. 2004; 12(3):562-8. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2004.64. View

3.
Contento I, Zybert P, Williams S . Relationship of cognitive restraint of eating and disinhibition to the quality of food choices of Latina women and their young children. Prev Med. 2004; 40(3):326-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.06.008. View

4.
Schwartz J, Byrd-Bredbenner C . Portion distortion: typical portion sizes selected by young adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006; 106(9):1412-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.06.006. View

5.
Chan C, Patch C, Williams P . Australian consumers are sceptical about but influenced by claims about fat on food labels. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004; 59(1):148-51. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602038. View