» Articles » PMID: 23720791

Echinocandin and Triazole Antifungal Susceptibility Profiles for Clinical Opportunistic Yeast and Mold Isolates Collected from 2010 to 2011: Application of New CLSI Clinical Breakpoints and Epidemiological Cutoff Values for Characterization Of...

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2013 May 31
PMID 23720791
Citations 122
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program monitors global susceptibility and resistance rates of newer and established antifungal agents. We report the echinocandin and triazole antifungal susceptibility patterns for 3,418 contemporary clinical isolates of yeasts and molds. The isolates were obtained from 98 laboratories in 34 countries during 2010 and 2011. Yeasts not presumptively identified by CHROMagar, the trehalose test, or growth at 42°C and all molds were sequence identified using internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and 28S (yeasts) or ITS, translation elongation factor (TEF), and 28S (molds) genes. Susceptibility testing was performed against 7 antifungals (anidulafungin, caspofungin, micafungin, fluconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole) using CLSI methods. Rates of resistance to all agents were determined using the new CLSI clinical breakpoints and epidemiological cutoff value criteria, as appropriate. Sequencing of fks hot spots was performed for echinocandin non-wild-type (WT) strains. Isolates included 3,107 from 21 Candida spp., 146 from 9 Aspergillus spp., 84 from Cryptococcus neoformans, 40 from 23 other mold species, and 41 from 9 other yeast species. Among Candida spp., resistance to the echinocandins was low (0.0 to 1.7%). Candida albicans and Candida glabrata that were resistant to anidulafungin, caspofungin, or micafungin were shown to have fks mutations. Resistance to fluconazole was low among the isolates of C. albicans (0.4%), Candida tropicalis (1.3%), and Candida parapsilosis (2.1%); however, 8.8% of C. glabrata isolates were resistant to fluconazole. Among echinocandin-resistant C. glabrata isolates from 2011, 38% were fluconazole resistant. Voriconazole was active against all Candida spp. except C. glabrata (10.5% non-WT), whereas posaconazole showed decreased activity against C. albicans (4.4%) and Candida krusei (15.2% non-WT). All agents except for the echinocandins were active against C. neoformans, and the triazoles were active against other yeasts (MIC90, 2 μg/ml). The echinocandins and triazoles were active against Aspergillus spp. (MIC90/minimum effective concentration [MEC90] range, 0.015 to 2 μg/ml), but the echinocandins were not active against other molds (MEC90 range, 4 to >16 μg/ml). Overall, echinocandin and triazole resistance rates were low; however, the fluconazole and echinocandin coresistance among C. glabrata strains warrants continued close surveillance.

Citing Articles

Echinocandin Adaptation in Is Accompanied by Altered Chromatin Accessibility at Gene Promoters and by Cell Wall Remodeling.

Sah S, Yadav A, Stahl T, Hayes J, Bulger M, Rustchenko E J Fungi (Basel). 2025; 11(2).

PMID: 39997404 PMC: 11856910. DOI: 10.3390/jof11020110.


Comparative evaluation of antifungal susceptibility testing methods of invasive Candida species and detection of FKS genes mutations in caspofungin intermediate and resistant isolates.

ElFeky D, El-Wakil D, Mwafy M, Atia M, Gohar N BMC Infect Dis. 2025; 25(1):114.

PMID: 39856577 PMC: 11760087. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-024-10435-8.


Population pharmacokinetics of caspofungin in critically ill patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-an ASAP ECMO study.

Abdul-Aziz M, Diehl A, Liu X, Cheng V, Corley A, Gilder E Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024; 69(2):e0143524.

PMID: 39692515 PMC: 11823646. DOI: 10.1128/aac.01435-24.


Use of echinocandin outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of infection caused by Candida spp.: utilization, outcomes and impact of a change to weekly dosing.

Clarke F, Grenfell A, Chao S, Richards H, Korman T, Rogers B J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024; 79(11):2896-2900.

PMID: 39259571 PMC: 11531808. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkae302.


Antifungal resistance: why are we losing this battle?.

Paiva Macedo J, Dias V Future Microbiol. 2024; 19(11):1027-1040.

PMID: 38904325 PMC: 11318685. DOI: 10.1080/17460913.2024.2342150.


References
1.
Pfaller M, Neofytos D, Diekema D, Azie N, Meier-Kriesche H, Quan S . Epidemiology and outcomes of candidemia in 3648 patients: data from the Prospective Antifungal Therapy (PATH Alliance®) registry, 2004-2008. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012; 74(4):323-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.10.003. View

2.
Pfaller M, Andes D, Diekema D, Espinel-Ingroff A, Sheehan D . Wild-type MIC distributions, epidemiological cutoff values and species-specific clinical breakpoints for fluconazole and Candida: time for harmonization of CLSI and EUCAST broth microdilution methods. Drug Resist Updat. 2010; 13(6):180-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.drup.2010.09.002. View

3.
Rex J, Pfaller M, Galgiani J, Bartlett M, Espinel-Ingroff A, Ghannoum M . Development of interpretive breakpoints for antifungal susceptibility testing: conceptual framework and analysis of in vitro-in vivo correlation data for fluconazole, itraconazole, and candida infections. Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility.... Clin Infect Dis. 1997; 24(2):235-47. DOI: 10.1093/clinids/24.2.235. View

4.
Parkins M, Sabuda D, Elsayed S, Laupland K . Adequacy of empirical antifungal therapy and effect on outcome among patients with invasive Candida species infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007; 60(3):613-8. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkm212. View

5.
Ahlquist Cleveland A, Farley M, Harrison L, Stein B, Hollick R, Lockhart S . Changes in incidence and antifungal drug resistance in candidemia: results from population-based laboratory surveillance in Atlanta and Baltimore, 2008-2011. Clin Infect Dis. 2012; 55(10):1352-61. PMC: 4698872. DOI: 10.1093/cid/cis697. View