» Articles » PMID: 22893576

Changes in Incidence and Antifungal Drug Resistance in Candidemia: Results from Population-based Laboratory Surveillance in Atlanta and Baltimore, 2008-2011

Overview
Journal Clin Infect Dis
Date 2012 Aug 16
PMID 22893576
Citations 171
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Candidemia is common and associated with high morbidity and mortality; changes in population-based incidence rates have not been reported.

Methods: We conducted active, population-based surveillance in metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia, and Baltimore City/County, Maryland (combined population 5.2 million), during 2008-2011. We calculated candidemia incidence and antifungal drug resistance compared with prior surveillance (Atlanta, 1992-1993; Baltimore, 1998-2000).

Results: We identified 2675 cases of candidemia with 2329 isolates during 3 years of surveillance. Mean annual crude incidence per 100 000 person-years was 13.3 in Atlanta and 26.2 in Baltimore. Rates were highest among adults aged ≥65 years (Atlanta, 59.1; Baltimore, 72.4) and infants (aged <1 year; Atlanta, 34.3; Baltimore, 46.2). In both locations compared with prior surveillance, adjusted incidence significantly declined for infants of both black and white race (Atlanta: black risk ratio [RR], 0.26 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .17-.38]; white RR: 0.19 [95% CI, .12-.29]; Baltimore: black RR, 0.38 [95% CI, .22-.64]; white RR: 0.51 [95% CI: .29-.90]). Prevalence of fluconazole resistance (7%) was unchanged compared with prior surveillance; 32 (1%) isolates were echinocandin-resistant, and 9 (8 Candida glabrata) were multidrug resistant to both fluconazole and an echinocandin.

Conclusions: We describe marked shifts in candidemia epidemiology over the past 2 decades. Adults aged ≥65 years replaced infants as the highest incidence group; adjusted incidence has declined significantly in infants. Use of antifungal prophylaxis, improvements in infection control, or changes in catheter insertion practices may be contributing to these declines. Further surveillance for antifungal resistance and efforts to determine effective prevention strategies are needed.

Citing Articles

Species-Specific Sensitivity and Levels of Beta-D-Glucan for the Diagnosis of Candidemia-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ullah N, Muccio M, Magnasco L, Sepulcri C, Giacobbe D, Vena A J Fungi (Basel). 2025; 11(2).

PMID: 39997443 PMC: 11856011. DOI: 10.3390/jof11020149.


Candidemia Following Severe COVID-19 in Hospitalised and Critical Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Srisurapanont K, Lerttiendamrong B, Meejun T, Thanakitcharu J, Manothummetha K, Thongkam A Mycoses. 2024; 67(10):e13798.

PMID: 39379339 PMC: 11607781. DOI: 10.1111/myc.13798.


Cluster analysis allowed to identify antifungal drugs that retain efficacy against isolated from patients with inflammatory diseases of the soft tissues of the maxillofacial area.

Faustova M, Dobrovolskyi V, Loban G, Bereza Y, Kotelnikova A, Dobrovolskyi O Front Oral Health. 2024; 5:1446045.

PMID: 39309422 PMC: 11412946. DOI: 10.3389/froh.2024.1446045.


Epidemiology of Invasive Candidiasis.

Bays D, Jenkins E, Lyman M, Chiller T, Strong N, Ostrosky-Zeichner L Clin Epidemiol. 2024; 16:549-566.

PMID: 39219747 PMC: 11366240. DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S459600.


CHANGING PATTERN OF NON ALBICANS CANDIDEMIA: OCCURENCE AND SUSCEPTIBILITY PROFILE IN AN INDONESIAN SECONDARY TEACHING HOSPITAL.

Veronica W, Neneng S, Nicolaski L Afr J Infect Dis. 2024; 18(2 Suppl):5-9.

PMID: 39156736 PMC: 11327915. DOI: 10.21010/Ajidv18n2S.2.


References
1.
Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, Sinopoli D, Chu H, Cosgrove S . An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355(26):2725-32. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa061115. View

2.
Pappas P, Kauffman C, Andes D, Benjamin Jr D, Calandra T, Edwards Jr J . Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009; 48(5):503-35. PMC: 7294538. DOI: 10.1086/596757. View

3.
Shetty S, Harrison L, Hajjeh R, Taylor T, Mirza S, Schmidt A . Determining risk factors for candidemia among newborn infants from population-based surveillance: Baltimore, Maryland, 1998-2000. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005; 24(7):601-4. DOI: 10.1097/01.inf.0000168751.11375.d6. View

4.
Pfaller M, Castanheira M, Messer S, Moet G, Jones R . Variation in Candida spp. distribution and antifungal resistance rates among bloodstream infection isolates by patient age: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2008-2009). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010; 68(3):278-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.06.015. View

5.
Pfaller M, Diekema D . Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007; 20(1):133-63. PMC: 1797637. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00029-06. View