» Articles » PMID: 23719889

Evaluation of Cell Viability and Functionality in Vessel-like Bioprintable Cell-laden Tubular Channels

Overview
Journal J Biomech Eng
Date 2013 May 31
PMID 23719889
Citations 80
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Organ printing is a novel concept recently introduced in developing artificial three-dimensional organs to bridge the gap between transplantation needs and organ shortage. One of the major challenges is inclusion of blood-vessellike channels between layers to support cell viability, postprinting functionality in terms of nutrient transport, and waste removal. In this research, we developed a novel and effective method to print tubular channels encapsulating cells in alginate to mimic the natural vascular system. An experimental investigation into the influence on cartilage progenitor cell (CPCs) survival, and the function of printing parameters during and after the printing process were presented. CPC functionality was evaluated by checking tissue-specific genetic marker expression and extracellular matrix production. Our results demonstrated the capability of direct fabrication of cell-laden tubular channels by our newly designed coaxial nozzle assembly and revealed that the bioprinting process could induce quantifiable cell death due to changes in dispensing pressure, coaxial nozzle geometry, and biomaterial concentration. Cells were able to recover during incubation, as well as to undergo differentiation with high-level cartilage-associated gene expression. These findings may not only help optimize our system but also can be applied to biomanufacturing of 3D functional cellular tissue engineering constructs for various organ systems.

Citing Articles

Nozzle Innovations That Improve Capacity and Capabilities of Multimaterial Additive Manufacturing.

McCauley P, Bayles A ACS Eng Au. 2024; 4(4):368-380.

PMID: 39185389 PMC: 11342301. DOI: 10.1021/acsengineeringau.4c00001.


Biofabrication of engineered blood vessels for biomedical applications.

Laowpanitchakorn P, Zeng J, Piantino M, Uchida K, Katsuyama M, Matsusaki M Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2024; 25(1):2330339.

PMID: 38633881 PMC: 11022926. DOI: 10.1080/14686996.2024.2330339.


Recent Developments in Bio-Ink Formulations Using Marine-Derived Biomaterials for Three-Dimensional (3D) Bioprinting.

Khiari Z Mar Drugs. 2024; 22(3).

PMID: 38535475 PMC: 10971850. DOI: 10.3390/md22030134.


Development of Biocompatible 3D-Printed Artificial Blood Vessels through Multidimensional Approaches.

Choi J, Lee E, Jang W, Kwon S J Funct Biomater. 2023; 14(10).

PMID: 37888162 PMC: 10607080. DOI: 10.3390/jfb14100497.


In Vitro and In Vivo Biological Assessments of 3D-Bioprinted Scaffolds for Dental Applications.

Mohd N, Razali M, Fauzi M, Abu Kasim N Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(16).

PMID: 37629064 PMC: 10454183. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241612881.


References
1.
Barron J, Wu P, Ladouceur H, Ringeisen B . Biological laser printing: a novel technique for creating heterogeneous 3-dimensional cell patterns. Biomed Microdevices. 2004; 6(2):139-47. DOI: 10.1023/b:bmmd.0000031751.67267.9f. View

2.
Wang X, Yan Y, Pan Y, Xiong Z, Liu H, Cheng J . Generation of three-dimensional hepatocyte/gelatin structures with rapid prototyping system. Tissue Eng. 2006; 12(1):83-90. DOI: 10.1089/ten.2006.12.83. View

3.
Napolitano A, Dean D, Man A, Youssef J, Ho D, Rago A . Scaffold-free three-dimensional cell culture utilizing micromolded nonadhesive hydrogels. Biotechniques. 2007; 43(4):494, 496-500. DOI: 10.2144/000112591. View

4.
Mironov V, Visconti R, Kasyanov V, Forgacs G, Drake C, Markwald R . Organ printing: tissue spheroids as building blocks. Biomaterials. 2009; 30(12):2164-74. PMC: 3773699. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.084. View

5.
Ozbolat I, Yu Y . Bioprinting toward organ fabrication: challenges and future trends. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013; 60(3):691-9. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2243912. View