» Articles » PMID: 23717503

Climate Change Vulnerability of Native and Alien Freshwater Fishes of California: a Systematic Assessment Approach

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 May 30
PMID 23717503
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Freshwater fishes are highly vulnerable to human-caused climate change. Because quantitative data on status and trends are unavailable for most fish species, a systematic assessment approach that incorporates expert knowledge was developed to determine status and future vulnerability to climate change of freshwater fishes in California, USA. The method uses expert knowledge, supported by literature reviews of status and biology of the fishes, to score ten metrics for both (1) current status of each species (baseline vulnerability to extinction) and (2) likely future impacts of climate change (vulnerability to extinction). Baseline and climate change vulnerability scores were derived for 121 native and 43 alien fish species. The two scores were highly correlated and were concordant among different scorers. Native species had both greater baseline and greater climate change vulnerability than did alien species. Fifty percent of California's native fish fauna was assessed as having critical or high baseline vulnerability to extinction whereas all alien species were classified as being less or least vulnerable. For vulnerability to climate change, 82% of native species were classified as highly vulnerable, compared with only 19% for aliens. Predicted climate change effects on freshwater environments will dramatically change the fish fauna of California. Most native fishes will suffer population declines and become more restricted in their distributions; some will likely be driven to extinction. Fishes requiring cold water (<22°C) are particularly likely to go extinct. In contrast, most alien fishes will thrive, with some species increasing in abundance and range. However, a few alien species will likewise be negatively affected through loss of aquatic habitats during severe droughts and physiologically stressful conditions present in most waterways during summer. Our method has high utility for predicting vulnerability to climate change of diverse fish species. It should be useful for setting conservation priorities in many different regions.

Citing Articles

Integrating biogeography and behavioral ecology to rapidly address biodiversity loss.

Marske K, Lanier H, Siler C, Rowe A, Stein L Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(15):e2110866120.

PMID: 37018201 PMC: 10104574. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2110866120.


Temperature and salinity preferences of endangered Delta Smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus, Actinopterygii, Osmeridae).

Hung T, Hammock B, Sandford M, Stillway M, Park M, Lindberg J Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):16558.

PMID: 36192440 PMC: 9530165. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20934-w.


Four decades of climatic fluctuations and fish recruitment stability across a marine-freshwater gradient.

Colombano D, Carlson S, Hobbs J, Ruhi A Glob Chang Biol. 2022; 28(17):5104-5120.

PMID: 35583053 PMC: 9545339. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16266.


Managing climate refugia for freshwater fishes under an expanding human footprint.

Ebersole J, Quinones R, Clements S, Letcher B Front Ecol Environ. 2020; 18(5):271-280.

PMID: 32944010 PMC: 7490791. DOI: 10.1002/fee.2206.


Basal tolerance but not plasticity gives invasive springtails the advantage in an assemblage setting.

Phillips L, Aitkenhead I, Janion-Scheepers C, King C, McGeoch M, Nielsen U Conserv Physiol. 2020; 8(1):coaa049.

PMID: 32577288 PMC: 7294889. DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coaa049.


References
1.
Donley E, Naiman R, Marineau M . Strategic planning for instream flow restoration: a case study of potential climate change impacts in the central Columbia River basin. Glob Chang Biol. 2017; 18(10):3071-3086. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02773.x. View

2.
Kiernan J, Moyle P, Crain P . Restoring native fish assemblages to a regulated California stream using the natural flow regime concept. Ecol Appl. 2012; 22(5):1472-82. DOI: 10.1890/11-0480.1. View

3.
Dudgeon D, Arthington A, Gessner M, Kawabata Z, Knowler D, Leveque C . Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2005; 81(2):163-82. DOI: 10.1017/S1464793105006950. View

4.
Kiernan J, Moyle P . Flows, droughts, and aliens: factors affecting the fish assemblage in a Sierra Nevada, California, stream. Ecol Appl. 2012; 22(4):1146-61. DOI: 10.1890/11-1047.1. View

5.
Vorosmarty C, McIntyre P, Gessner M, Dudgeon D, Prusevich A, Green P . Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature. 2010; 467(7315):555-61. DOI: 10.1038/nature09440. View