» Articles » PMID: 21844354

Flow Regime, Temperature, and Biotic Interactions Drive Differential Declines of Trout Species Under Climate Change

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2011 Aug 17
PMID 21844354
Citations 52
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Broad-scale studies of climate change effects on freshwater species have focused mainly on temperature, ignoring critical drivers such as flow regime and biotic interactions. We use downscaled outputs from general circulation models coupled with a hydrologic model to forecast the effects of altered flows and increased temperatures on four interacting species of trout across the interior western United States (1.01 million km(2)), based on empirical statistical models built from fish surveys at 9,890 sites. Projections under the 2080s A1B emissions scenario forecast a mean 47% decline in total suitable habitat for all trout, a group of fishes of major socioeconomic and ecological significance. We project that native cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarkii, already excluded from much of its potential range by nonnative species, will lose a further 58% of habitat due to an increase in temperatures beyond the species' physiological optima and continued negative biotic interactions. Habitat for nonnative brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis and brown trout Salmo trutta is predicted to decline by 77% and 48%, respectively, driven by increases in temperature and winter flood frequency caused by warmer, rainier winters. Habitat for rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, is projected to decline the least (35%) because negative temperature effects are partly offset by flow regime shifts that benefit the species. These results illustrate how drivers other than temperature influence species response to climate change. Despite some uncertainty, large declines in trout habitat are likely, but our findings point to opportunities for strategic targeting of mitigation efforts to appropriate stressors and locations.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of genetic consequences of stocking on the southern-margin populations of white-spotted charr.

Masuda T, Shimono Y, Kishi D, Koizumi I Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(8):e70140.

PMID: 39130102 PMC: 11311121. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70140.


Molecular underpinnings underlying behaviors changes in the brain of juvenile common carp (Cyrinus carpio) in response to warming.

Zhao Y, Duan M, Lin X, Li W, Liu H, Meng K J Adv Res. 2023; 63:43-56.

PMID: 37956862 PMC: 11380011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2023.10.017.


Whole genome resequencing identifies local adaptation associated with environmental variation for redband trout.

Andrews K, Seaborn T, Egan J, Fagnan M, New D, Chen Z Mol Ecol. 2022; 32(4):800-818.

PMID: 36478624 PMC: 9905331. DOI: 10.1111/mec.16810.


Aquaponics as a Promising Strategy to Mitigate Impacts of Climate Change on Rainbow Trout Culture.

Vasdravanidis C, Alvanou M, Lattos A, Papadopoulos D, Chatzigeorgiou I, Ravani M Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(19).

PMID: 36230264 PMC: 9559468. DOI: 10.3390/ani12192523.


Learning takes time: Biotic resistance by native herbivores increases through the invasion process.

Santamaria J, Golo R, Verdura J, Tomas F, Ballesteros E, Alcoverro T Ecol Lett. 2022; 25(11):2525-2539.

PMID: 36209457 PMC: 9828756. DOI: 10.1111/ele.14115.


References
1.
van der Putten W, Macel M, Visser M . Predicting species distribution and abundance responses to climate change: why it is essential to include biotic interactions across trophic levels. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010; 365(1549):2025-34. PMC: 2880132. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0037. View

2.
Rahel F, Olden J . Assessing the effects of climate change on aquatic invasive species. Conserv Biol. 2008; 22(3):521-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00950.x. View

3.
Wiens J, Stralberg D, Jongsomjit D, Howell C, Snyder M . Niches, models, and climate change: assessing the assumptions and uncertainties. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106 Suppl 2:19729-36. PMC: 2780938. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0901639106. View

4.
Palmer M, Lettenmaier D, Poff N, Postel S, Richter B, Warner R . Climate change and river ecosystems: protection and adaptation options. Environ Manage. 2009; 44(6):1053-68. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-009-9329-1. View

5.
Lytle D, Poff N . Adaptation to natural flow regimes. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006; 19(2):94-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.002. View