» Articles » PMID: 23715903

The Predictive Value of Treatment Response Using FDG PET Performed on Day 21 of Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. A Prospective, Multicentre Study (RTEP3)

Abstract

Purpose: FDG PET has been suggested to have predictive value in the prognosis of oesophageal carcinoma. However, the retrospective studies reported in the literature have shown discordant results. Additionally, only four studies have evaluated FDG PET during chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with different histological lesions. The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive value of FDG PET performed early during CRT (on day 21) in a population of patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods: Included in this prospective study were 57 patients with a histological diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus. Of these 57 patients, 48 (84%) were evaluated (aged 63 ± 11 years; 44 men, 4 women). Each patient underwent FDG PET (4.5 MBq/kg) before CRT, according to the Herskovic protocol (t0; PET₁) and on day 21 ± 3 from the start of CRT (d21; PET₂). The response assessment included a clinical examination, CT scan or FDG PET and histological analysis 3 months and 1 year after PET₁. The patients were classified as showing a complete response (CR) or a noncomplete response. A quantitative analysis was carried out for PET₁ and PET₂ using the following parameters: SUVmax, SUVmean (with SUVmean40 as the 3-D volume at an SUVmax threshold of 40% and SUVmeanp as that defined by a physician), tumour volume (TV, with TV40 defined as the TV at 40% of SUVmax, and TVp as that defined by a physician); and the total lesion glycolysis (TLG, SUVmean × TV, with TLG₄₀ defined as the TLG at 40% of SUVmax, and TLGp as that defined by a physician). The differences in responses at 3 months and 1 year between PET₁ (t0) and PET₂ (d21) were assessed in terms of variations in SUV, TV and TLG using a repeated measures of variance (ANOVA).

Results: SUVmax, SUVmean and TLG decreased significantly between PET₁ (t0) and PET₂ (d21; p < 0.0001). The TV significantly decreased only when assessed as TVp (p = 0.02); TV₄₀ did not decrease significantly. With respect to the predictive value of PET₁, only TV40_1 and TVp_1 values, and therefore TLG40_1 and TLGp_1, but not the SUV values, were significantly lower in patients with CR at 3 months. SUVmax1, TVp_1 and TLGp_1 were significantly lower in patients with CR at 1 year. With respect to the predictive value of PET₂, only TV40_2 and TVp_2 values, and therefore TLG40_2 and TLGp_2, but not the SUV values, were significantly lower in patients with CR at 3 months. None of the PET₂ parameters had significant value in predicting patient outcome at 1 year. The changes in SUVmax, TV₄₀, TVp, TLG₄₀ and TLGp between PET₁ and PET₂ had no relationship to patient outcome at 3 months or 1 year.

Conclusion: This prospective, multicentre study performed in a selected population of patients with oesophageal squamous cell cancer demonstrates that the parameters derived from baseline PET₁ are good predictors of response to CRT. Specifically, a high TV and TLG are associated with a poor response to CRT at 3 months and 1 year, and a high SUVmax is associated with a poor response to CRT at 1 year. FDG PET performed during CRT on day 21 appears to have less clinical relevance. However, patients with a large functional TV on day 21 of CRT have a poor clinical outcome (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 00934505).

Citing Articles

Baseline and interim [18F]FDG-PET/MRI to assess treatment response and survival in patients with M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated by curative-intent therapy.

Chao Y, Chang C, Chang Y, Chan S, Chiu C, Ng S Cancer Imaging. 2023; 23(1):109.

PMID: 37932848 PMC: 10629192. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-023-00630-2.


Interim position emission tomography-computed tomography during multimodality treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer: a scoping review.

Zhu H, Hao S, Tseng I, Shen J, Rivin Del Campo E, Davies A Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023; 13(9):6280-6295.

PMID: 37711778 PMC: 10498200. DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-1306.


Prognostic Assessment of Interim F18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Esophageal Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation With or Without Surgery.

Lavertu S, Barkati M, Beaulieu S, Martin J, Campeau M, Donath D Cureus. 2022; 14(9):e29086.

PMID: 36259030 PMC: 9558932. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.29086.


F-FDG PET/CT Metrics Are Correlated to the Pathological Response in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated With Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Neoadjuvant Chemo-Radiotherapy.

Simoni N, Rossi G, Benetti G, Zuffante M, Micera R, Pavarana M Front Oncol. 2020; 10:599907.

PMID: 33330097 PMC: 7729075. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.599907.


Prognostic value of sarcopenia in patients treated by Radiochemotherapy for locally advanced oesophageal cancer.

Mallet R, Modzelewski R, Lequesne J, Mihailescu S, Decazes P, Auvray H Radiat Oncol. 2020; 15(1):116.

PMID: 32443967 PMC: 7245030. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01545-z.


References
1.
Barber T, Duong C, Leong T, Bressel M, Drummond E, Hicks R . 18F-FDG PET/CT has a high impact on patient management and provides powerful prognostic stratification in the primary staging of esophageal cancer: a prospective study with mature survival data. J Nucl Med. 2012; 53(6):864-71. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.101568. View

2.
Makino T, Miyata H, Yamasaki M, Fujiwara Y, Takiguchi S, Nakajima K . Utility of response evaluation to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Surgery. 2010; 148(5):908-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.02.016. View

3.
Omloo J, van Heijl M, Hoekstra O, van Berge Henegouwen M, van Lanschot J, Sloof G . FDG-PET parameters as prognostic factor in esophageal cancer patients: a review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011; 18(12):3338-52. PMC: 3192273. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-1732-1. View

4.
Fukunaga T, Okazumi S, Koide Y, Isono K, Imazeki K . Evaluation of esophageal cancers using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET. J Nucl Med. 1998; 39(6):1002-7. View

5.
Arslan N, Miller T, Dehdashti F, Battafarano R, Siegel B . Evaluation of response to neoadjuvant therapy by quantitative 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose with positron emission tomography in patients with esophageal cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2003; 4(4):301-10. DOI: 10.1016/s1536-1632(02)00011-2. View