FDG-PET in the Prediction of Pathologic Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced, Resectable Esophageal Cancer
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: To assess the efficacy of 18Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for predicting a pathologic response in locally advanced esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Methods And Materials: All enrolled patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy and underwent two FDG-PET scans, before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. We compared the results of the preoperative FDG-PET scans with the pathologic results.
Results: From July 2001 to July 2004, 32 patients (29 men and 3 women) were enrolled in this study. Pathologic complete response (pCR) in the esophagus was achieved in 21 of 32 patients (66%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) in the primary tumors of the preoperative FDG-PET were 27%, 95%, 75%, and 71%, respectively. In regional lymph nodes, these values were 16%, 98%, 36%, and 93%, respectively. The mean standardized uptake value (SUV) of primary tumors was initially 5.6 +/- 3.6 and changed to 1.5 +/- 1.3 after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (p < 0.05). If analysis of metabolic response (SUV decrease, DeltaSUV) was limited to initially highly metabolic primary tumors (SUV > or =4.0), pathologic response was correlated with metabolic response (p = 0.006).
Conclusions: This study suggested that the pathologic response of an initially highly metabolic tumor after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy could be correlated with the metabolic response, and FDG-PET can provide additional information on tumor response to chemoradiotherapy.
Shin Y, Jang J, Yoo Y, Yu J, Song K, Jo Y Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2024; 12:goae060.
PMID: 38974878 PMC: 11227365. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goae060.
Gaber C, Sarker J, Abdelaziz A, Okpara E, Lee T, Klempner S Cancer Med. 2024; 13(4):e7076.
PMID: 38457244 PMC: 10923050. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7076.
Zhu H, Hao S, Tseng I, Shen J, Rivin Del Campo E, Davies A Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023; 13(9):6280-6295.
PMID: 37711778 PMC: 10498200. DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-1306.
Choi Y, Choi J, Hong T, Choi Y, Oh D, Woo S Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021; 49(2):751-762.
PMID: 34365522 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05487-w.
Hou T, Dai K, Wu M, Hua K, Tai H, Huang W Onco Targets Ther. 2019; 12:6439-6451.
PMID: 31496743 PMC: 6698165. DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S205803.