» Articles » PMID: 23705576

Comparison of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Atherosclerotic Carotid Plaques Using Parallel Imaging and 3 T Black-blood in Vivo CMR

Abstract

Background: To determine if black-blood 3 T cardiovascular magnetic resonance (bb-CMR) can depict differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid atherosclerotic plaques in acute ischemic stroke patients.

Methods: In this prospective monocentric observational study 34 patients (24 males; 70 ±9.3 years) with symptomatic carotid disease defined as ischemic brain lesions in one internal carotid artery territory on diffusion weighted images underwent a carotid bb-CMR at 3 T with fat-saturated pre- and post-contrast T1w-, PDw-, T2w- and TOF images using surface coils and Parallel Imaging techniques (PAT factor = 2) within 10 days after symptom onset. All patients underwent extensive clinical workup (lab, brain MR, duplex sonography, 24-hour ECG, transesophageal echocardiography) to exclude other causes of ischemic stroke. Prevalence of American Heart Association lesion type VI (AHA-LT6), status of the fibrous cap, presence of hemorrhage/thrombus and area measurements of calcification, necrotic core and hemorrhage were determined in both carotid arteries in consensus by two reviewers who were blinded to clinical information. McNemar and Wilcoxon's signed rank tests were use for statistical comparison. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Symptomatic plaques showed a higher prevalence of AHA-LT6 (67.7% vs. 11.8%; p < 0.001; odds ratio = 12.5), ruptured fibrous caps (44.1% vs. 2.9%; p < 0.001; odds ratio = 15.0), juxtaluminal thrombus (26.5 vs. 0%; p < 0.01; odds ratio = 7.3) and intraplaque hemorrhage (58.6% vs. 11.8%; p = 0.01; odds ratio = 3.8). Necrotic core and hemorrhage areas were greater in symptomatic plaques (14.1 mm2 vs. 5.5 mm2 and 13.6 mm2 vs. 5.3 mm2; p < 0.01, respectively).

Conclusion: 3 T bb-CMR is able to differentiate between symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid plaques, demonstrating the potential of bb-CMR to differentiate between stable and vulnerable lesions and ultimately to identify patients with low versus high risk for cardiovascular complications. Best predictors of the symptomatic side were a ruptured fibrous cap, AHA-LT 6, juxtaluminal hemorrhage/thrombus, and intraplaque hemorrhage.

Citing Articles

Combined near infrared photoacoustic imaging and ultrasound detects vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque.

Schneider M, Wang J, Kare A, Adkar S, Salmi D, Bell C Biomaterials. 2023; 302:122314.

PMID: 37776766 PMC: 10872807. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122314.


Differences in left and right carotid plaque vulnerability in patients with bilateral carotid plaques: a CARE-II study.

Shao S, Shi H, Wang G, Li R, Sun Q, Yao B Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2023; 8(4):284-291.

PMID: 36596656 PMC: 10512039. DOI: 10.1136/svn-2022-001937.


Texture Analysis Based on Vascular Ultrasound to Identify the Vulnerable Carotid Plaques.

Zhang L, Lyu Q, Ding Y, Hu C, Hui P Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:885209.

PMID: 35720730 PMC: 9204477. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.885209.


Relation of Carotid Plaque Features Detected with Ultrasonography-Based Radiomics to Clinical Symptoms.

Huang Z, Cheng X, Liu H, Bi X, Liu Y, Lv W Transl Stroke Res. 2021; 13(6):970-982.

PMID: 34741749 DOI: 10.1007/s12975-021-00963-9.


New insight into biology, molecular diagnostics and treatment options of unstable carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a narrative review.

Migdalski A, Jawien A Ann Transl Med. 2021; 9(14):1207.

PMID: 34430648 PMC: 8350668. DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-7197.


References
1.
Boussel L, Arora S, Rapp J, Rutt B, Huston J, Parker D . Atherosclerotic plaque progression in carotid arteries: monitoring with high-spatial-resolution MR imaging--multicenter trial. Radiology. 2009; 252(3):789-96. PMC: 2734890. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2523081798. View

2.
Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Casscells S, Litovsky S, Rumberger J . From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation. 2003; 108(14):1664-72. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000087480.94275.97. View

3.
Min J, Feignoux J, Treutenaere J, Laperche T, Sablayrolles J . The prognostic value of multidetector coronary CT angiography for the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events: a multicenter observational cohort study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010; 26(6):721-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-010-9613-4. View

4.
Yuan C, Mitsumori L, Beach K, Maravilla K . Carotid atherosclerotic plaque: noninvasive MR characterization and identification of vulnerable lesions. Radiology. 2001; 221(2):285-99. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2212001612. View

5.
Saam T, Hatsukami T, Takaya N, Chu B, Underhill H, Kerwin W . The vulnerable, or high-risk, atherosclerotic plaque: noninvasive MR imaging for characterization and assessment. Radiology. 2007; 244(1):64-77. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2441051769. View