» Articles » PMID: 20651015

MR Carotid Plaque Imaging and Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography Identifies Lesions Associated with Recent Ipsilateral Thromboembolic Symptoms: an in Vivo Study at 3T

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2010 Jul 24
PMID 20651015
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: Recent research has suggested the importance of plaque composition to identify patients at risk for stroke. This study aims to identify specific plaque features on 3T carotid MR imaging and CE-MRA associated with recent carotid thromboembolic symptoms in patients with mild/moderate versus severe stenosis.

Materials And Methods: Ninety-seven consecutive patients (symptomatic, 13; asymptomatic, 84) with 50%-99% stenosis by sonography or CT angiography underwent carotid plaque imaging combined with MRA at 3T. The symptomatic carotid artery or the most stenotic asymptomatic carotid artery was chosen as the index vessel to be analyzed. Plaque features were compared by symptomatic status in patients with mild/moderate (30%-70%) versus severe (70%-99%) stenosis on MRA.

Results: Ninety (92.8%) patients had sufficient image quality for interpretation. In 50 patients with mild/moderate stenosis, there were significant associations between the presence of the following plaque characteristics and symptoms: thin/ruptured fibrous cap (100% versus 36%, P = .006) and lipid-rich necrotic core (100% versus 39%, P = .022), with marginal association with hemorrhage (86% versus 33%, P = .055). In 40 patients with severe stenosis, only the angiographic presence of ulceration (86% versus 36%, P = .039) was associated with symptoms.

Conclusions: Several plaque components identified on 3T MR imaging are correlated with recent ipsilateral carotid thromboembolic symptoms. These preliminary results also suggest that associations between plaque characteristics and symptom history may vary by degree of stenosis. If confirmed in larger studies, carotid MR imaging may distinguish stable from unstable lesions, particularly in individuals with mild/moderate stenosis in whom the role of surgical intervention is currently unclear.

Citing Articles

Using Adaptive Imaging Parameters to Improve PEGylated Ultrasmall Iron Oxide Nanoparticles-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography.

Li C, Shan S, Chen L, Afshari M, Wang H, Lu K Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 11(39):e2405719.

PMID: 39164979 PMC: 11497041. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202405719.


New Technologies in the Assessment of Carotid Stenosis: Beyond the Color-Doppler Ultrasound-High Frame Rate Vector-Flow and 3D Arterial Analysis Ultrasound.

David E, Martinelli O, Pacini P, Di Serafino M, Huang P, Dolcetti V Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(8).

PMID: 37189578 PMC: 10137449. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13081478.


The role of non-stenosing carotid artery plaques in embolic stroke of undetermined source, is it a silent offender? A review of literature.

Jumah A, Aboul Nour H, Fana M, Choudhury O, Eltous L, Zoghoul S Interv Neuroradiol. 2022; 30(5):759-767.

PMID: 36451548 PMC: 11569466. DOI: 10.1177/15910199221143172.


Vessel wall MR imaging of aortic arch, cervical carotid and intracranial arteries in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source: A narrative review.

Sakai Y, Lehman V, Eisenmenger L, Obusez E, Kharal G, Xiao J Front Neurol. 2022; 13:968390.

PMID: 35968273 PMC: 9366886. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.968390.


Imaging of the extracranial internal carotid artery in acute ischemic stroke: assessment of stenosis, plaques, and image quality using relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering (REACT).

Hoyer U, Lennartz S, Abdullayev N, Fichter F, Junger S, Goertz L Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022; 12(7):3640-3654.

PMID: 35782261 PMC: 9246733. DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-1122.


References
1.
Falk E . Why do plaques rupture?. Circulation. 1992; 86(6 Suppl):III30-42. View

2.
Hatsukami T, Ross R, Polissar N, Yuan C . Visualization of fibrous cap thickness and rupture in human atherosclerotic carotid plaque in vivo with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2000; 102(9):959-64. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.102.9.959. View

3.
Barnett H, Taylor D, Haynes R, Sackett D, Peerless S, Ferguson G . Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325(7):445-53. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199108153250701. View

4.
Yamada N, Higashi M, Otsubo R, Sakuma T, Oyama N, Tanaka R . Association between signal hyperintensity on T1-weighted MR imaging of carotid plaques and ipsilateral ischemic events. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007; 28(2):287-92. PMC: 7977430. View

5.
De Marco J, Nesbit G, Wesbey G, Richardson D . Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994; 163(5):1205-12. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.163.5.7976902. View