» Articles » PMID: 23687603

Which Patients with Dilated Common Bile And/or Pancreatic Ducts Have Positive Findings on EUS?

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2013 May 21
PMID 23687603
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Patients with dilated common bile duct (CBD) (>7mm) and/or pancreatic duct (PD) on abdominal imaging are often referred for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). In many cases, the EUS shows no obvious etiology for the dilated ducts.

Objective: Find clinical factors that may predict which patients are more likely to have positive findings on EUS to explain the etiologies for the dilated ducts.

Design: Retrospective database analysis.

Setting: Tertiary-care university hospital.

Patients: Patients referred for EUS for dilated CBD and/or PD from January 2004 to February 2010 were included in this study. Only patients without an obvious etiology for the dilated ducts on abdominal imaging were included.

Interventions: An EUS was performed by using either a radial echoendoscope or a linear endoscope to evaluate the common bile duct and/or the pancreatic duct. When appropriate fine needle aspiration of the mass or cyst was performed.

Main Outcome Measurements: The characteristics of patients who had positive findings on EUS to explain the etiology of their dilated PD and/or CBD.

Results: A total of 140 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 64 years, 51 (36%) male and 115 (82%) white. The majority of our patients had a presenting symptom of abdominal pain 105 (75%). 49 (36%) had elevated AST or ALT, 25 (8%) had an elevated bilirubin and 13 (23%) had an elevated lipase. EUS findings explained the dilated ducts in 54 (39%) of our patients, most common diagnoses included: CBD stone in 11 (8%), non-calcific chronic pancreatitis in 9 (6%), pancreatic mass in 8 (6%), IPMN in 7 (5%). On bivarate analysis patients who were older (p = 0.006), male (p = 0.001), had elevated LFTs (p = <0.001), had elevated lipase (p = 0.021) or had dilated CBD and PD (p = 0.007) were more likely to have an etiology for their dilated duct(s) discovered on EUS.

Limitations: A retrospective study with a small number of patients.

Conclusion: Older patients, males and those patients presenting with concurrent elevations in the AST/ALT and/or lipase were more likely to have an underlying etiology discovered on EUS. Furthermore, EUS may detect an undiagnosed pancreatic malignancy in patients presenting with unexplained duct dilation.

Citing Articles

Different Etiologies of Dilated Pancreatic Duct Based on Endoscopic Ultrasonography Findings.

Sobhrakhshankhah E, Zamani F, Ajdarkosh H, Behnam B, Faraji A, Khoonsari M Middle East J Dig Dis. 2024; 16(3):155-159.

PMID: 39386335 PMC: 11459282. DOI: 10.34172/mejdd.2024.382.


Diagnostic Yield of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Common Bile Duct Dilation: A Real Breakthrough.

Ferreira A, Xavier S, Dias de Castro F, Magalhaes J, Leite S, Cotter J Dig Dis Sci. 2024; 69(11):4275-4282.

PMID: 39342067 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-024-08628-x.


Diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound in dilated common bile duct with non-diagnostic cross-sectional imaging.

Mahajan A, Das K, Kishalaya , Misra D, Das K, Dhali G BMC Gastroenterol. 2024; 24(1):309.

PMID: 39261769 PMC: 11391711. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03406-5.


Predictors of Choledocholithiasis in Cholecystectomy Patients and Their Cutoff Values and Prediction Model in Korea in Comparison with the 2019 ASGE Guidelines.

Woo J, Cho H, Ryu K, Choi Y, Lee S, Lee T Gut Liver. 2024; 18(6):1060-1068.

PMID: 38712399 PMC: 11565007. DOI: 10.5009/gnl230534.


An assessment of the yield of EUS in patients referred for dilated common bile duct and normal liver function tests.

Kaspy M, Hassan G, Paquin S, Sahai A Endosc Ultrasound. 2019; 8(5):318-320.

PMID: 31249161 PMC: 6791102. DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_21_19.


References
1.
Sivak Jr M, SULLIVAN Jr B . Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography: analysis of the normal pancreatogram. Am J Dig Dis. 1976; 21(3):263-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF01095900. View

2.
Parulekar S . Ultrasound evaluation of common bile duct size. Radiology. 1979; 133(3 Pt 1):703-7. DOI: 10.1148/133.3.703. View

3.
Cohen S, Bacon B, Berlin J, Fleischer D, Hecht G, Loehrer Sr P . National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: ERCP for diagnosis and therapy, January 14-16, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 56(6):803-9. DOI: 10.1067/mge.2002.129875. View

4.
Kim J, Lee J, Lee K, Park D, Hyun J, Paik S . The clinical significance of common bile-duct dilatation in patients without biliary symptoms or causative lesions on ultrasonography. Endoscopy. 2001; 33(6):495-500. DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-15088. View

5.
Malik S, Kaushik N, Khalid A, Bauer K, Brody D, Slivka A . EUS yield in evaluating biliary dilatation in patients with normal serum liver enzymes. Dig Dis Sci. 2007; 52(2):508-12. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-006-9582-6. View