» Articles » PMID: 15131794

Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms: a Report of the Cooperative Pancreatic Cyst Study

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2004 May 8
PMID 15131794
Citations 374
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background & Aims: Cysts of the pancreas display a wide spectrum of histology, including inflammatory (pseudocysts), benign (serous), premalignant (mucinous), and malignant (mucinous) lesions. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) may offer a diagnostic tool through the combination of imaging and guided, fine-needle aspiration (FNA). The purpose of this investigation was to determine the most accurate test for differentiating mucinous from nonmucinous cystic lesions.

Methods: The results of EUS imaging, cyst fluid cytology, and cyst fluid tumor markers (CEA, CA 72-4, CA 125, CA 19-9, and CA 15-3) were prospectively collected and compared in a multicenter study using histology as the final diagnostic standard.

Results: Three hundred forty-one (341) patients underwent EUS and FNA of a pancreatic cystic lesion; 112 of these patients underwent surgical resection, providing a histologic diagnosis of the cystic lesion (68 mucinous, 7 serous, 27 inflammatory, 5 endocrine, and 5 other). Receiver operator curve analysis of the tumor markers demonstrated that cyst fluid CEA (optimal cutoff of 192 ng/mL) demonstrated the greatest area under the curve (0.79) for differentiating mucinous vs. nonmucinous cystic lesions. The accuracy of CEA (88 of 111, 79%) was significantly greater than the accuracy of EUS morphology (57 of 112, 51%) or cytology (64 of 109, 59%) (P < 0.05). There was no combination of tests that provided greater accuracy than CEA alone (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Of tested markers, cyst fluid CEA is the most accurate test available for the diagnosis of mucinous cystic lesions of the pancreas.

Citing Articles

Cystic Fluid Total Proteins, Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, Lipid Metabolites, and Lymphocytes: Worrisome Biomarkers for Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms.

Jafarnezhad-Ansariha F, Contran N, Cristofori C, Simonato M, Davanzo V, Moz S Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(4).

PMID: 40002238 PMC: 11853297. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17040643.


Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Imaging: A Systematic Review.

Podina N, Gheorghe E, Constantin A, Cazacu I, Croitoru V, Gheorghe C United European Gastroenterol J. 2025; 13(1):55-77.

PMID: 39865461 PMC: 11866320. DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12723.


The Effectiveness of Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Computed Tomography in the Differentiation of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms: A Single-Center Experience.

Ozturk B, Ceyhan K, Bektas M Turk J Gastroenterol. 2024; 35(12):945-953.

PMID: 39641318 PMC: 11639599. DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2023.23492.


Diagnostic performance of intracystic carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) versus glucose in differentiation of mucinous and non-mucinous pancreatic cysts.

Gyimesi G, Keczer B, Rein P, Horvath M, Szucs A, Marjai T Pathol Oncol Res. 2024; 30:1611881.

PMID: 39449683 PMC: 11499142. DOI: 10.3389/pore.2024.1611881.


Top 100 cited articles related to EUS: A bibliometric analysis.

Li T, Kang C, Ren G, Lv Y, Luo H, Kang X Endosc Ultrasound. 2024; 13(4):259-268.

PMID: 39318756 PMC: 11419419. DOI: 10.1097/eus.0000000000000081.