» Articles » PMID: 23682518

Inferior Vena Cava Diameter and Collapsibility Index: a Practical Non-invasive Evaluation of Intravascular Fluid Volume in Critically-ill Patients

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2013 May 21
PMID 23682518
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Assessment of intravascular volume status is an essential parameter for the diagnosis and management of critically-ill patients. Generally, central venous pressure (CVP), which is an invasive measure, has been recommended for this purpose. Since CVP has been associated with many complications, inferior vena cava diameter and collapsibility index (IVC-CI) were used in the present study to evaluate the intravascular volume status of critically-ill patients at Rajavithi Hospital.

Objective: To conduct a prospective, cross-sectional study to evaluate the IVC diameter as a guidance for estimating the volume status in critically-ill patients by bedside ultrasonography, focusing on correlations between CVP and lVC-Cl and lVC diameter

Material And Method: Critically-ill patients who had been placed with a functioning central venous catheter were prospectively enrolled. Evaluation of intravascular volume status was performed by bedside ultrasonography to measure the IVC diameters (IVCD), both end-inspiratory (iIVCD) and end-expiratory (eIVCD). The IVC collapsibility indices (IVC-CI) were calculated by an equation and then were compared with the CVP values.

Results: Of the 70 enrolled patients, with a mean age of 63.8 +/- 1.9 years, 64.3% were intubated. The most common indication of ICU admission was sepsis with hemodynamic instability (80.0%). The volume status of patients was stratified by their CVP levels as hypovolemic 15.7%, euvolemic 32.9% and hypervolemic 51.4% which correspond with the IVC-CI of 45.69 +/- 16.16%, 31.23 +/- 16.77%, and 17.82 +/- 12.36% respectively (p < 0.001). The highest significant correlation was found between the CVP and IVC-CI (r = -0.612, p < 0.001). In addition, there was a significant correlation between CVP and iIVCD (r = 0.535, p < 0.001); and between the CVP and mean IVCD (r = 0.397, p = 0.001).

Conclusion: The present study supported the correlation between CVP and IVC-CI. The authors conclude that the IVC-CI can provide a useful guide for noninvasive intravascular volume status assessment of critically-ill patients.

Citing Articles

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Central Venous Pressure Using Inferior Vena Cava Characteristics: An Estimate Guide for Right Atrial Pressure in Intensive Care Unit.

Hussein M, Mohammad W, Essa S J Cardiovasc Echogr. 2025; 34(4):206-213.

PMID: 39895889 PMC: 11784733. DOI: 10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_2_24.


Ultrasound-guided estimation of internal jugular vein collapsibility index in patients with shock in emergency department.

Chawang H, Kaeley N, Bhardwaj B, Chauhan U, Baid H, Asokan R Turk J Emerg Med. 2022; 22(4):206-212.

PMID: 36353383 PMC: 9639735. DOI: 10.4103/2452-2473.357352.


Preoperative assessment of inferior vena cava collapsibility index by ultrasound is not a reliable predictor of post-spinal anesthesia hypotension.

Roy S, Kothari N, Goyal S, Sharma A, Kumar R, Kaloria N Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022; 73(4):385-392.

PMID: 35430190 PMC: 10362455. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2022.04.001.


Inferior Vena Cava/Abdominal Aorta Ratio as a Guide for Fluid Resuscitation.

Kusumastuti N, Latief A, Pudjiadi A J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2022; 14(4):211-215.

PMID: 35125786 PMC: 8780629. DOI: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_154_20.


Inferior vena cava diameter measurements and BUN/creatinine values to determine dehydration in patients with hip fractures preoperatively: A prospective observational study.

Kaydu A, Gokcek E Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98(17):e15197.

PMID: 31027065 PMC: 6831161. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015197.