» Articles » PMID: 23674164

Current Lynch Syndrome Tumor Screening Practices: a Survey of Genetic Counselors

Overview
Journal J Genet Couns
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Genetics
Date 2013 May 16
PMID 23674164
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An electronic survey of the National Society of Genetic Counselors Cancer Special Interest Group was conducted in July 2011 to assess Lynch syndrome tumor screening programs and identify barriers to implementation. Over half of respondents (52.8 %) reported having a routine Lynch syndrome tumor screening protocol for newly diagnosed colon and/or endometrial cancers, and approximately half of these used a universal approach. There was an increase in the number of those screening over time, especially in the past 3 years. Tumor screening methods varied; 34/53 (64.2 %) started with immunohistochemistry, 11/53 (20.8 %) started with microsatellite instability testing and 8/53 (15.1 %) performed both on newly diagnosed colorectal tumors. Just 21.7 % (23/106) of respondents indicated they have a tumor screening program in place for newly diagnosed endometrial cancers. Written consent is rarely obtained (7.1 %) and the method of how results were returned to the patient was variable among respondents. Prevalent barriers to implementation were concern about cost, bringing key players together and convincing medical staff of the necessity. Use of Lynch syndrome tumor screening is in clinical practice, but protocols vary widely. This survey provides a glimpse of current practices and common barriers, and identifies the need for tumor screening algorithms with outcomes data.

Citing Articles

A simplified two-marker immunohistochemistry strategy for Lynch syndrome screening in endometrial cancer patients.

Aiob A, Kim Y, Kim K, Kim H, Kim Y, Kim D Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023; 66(6):537-544.

PMID: 37839795 PMC: 10663397. DOI: 10.5468/ogs.23124.


From Genetics to Histomolecular Characterization: An Insight into Colorectal Carcinogenesis in Lynch Syndrome.

Lepore Signorile M, Disciglio V, Di Carlo G, Pisani A, Simone C, Ingravallo G Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(13).

PMID: 34201893 PMC: 8268977. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22136767.


Stakeholders' views of integrating universal tumour screening and genetic testing for colorectal and endometrial cancer into routine oncology.

OShea R, Rankin N, Kentwell M, Gleeson M, Tucker K, Hampel H Eur J Hum Genet. 2021; 29(11):1634-1644.

PMID: 33811254 PMC: 8560784. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00871-4.


Mismatch Repair Universal Screening of Endometrial Cancers (MUSE) in a Canadian Cohort.

Lawrence J, Richer L, Arseneau J, Zeng X, Chong G, Weber E Curr Oncol. 2021; 28(1):509-522.

PMID: 33467402 PMC: 7903281. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28010052.


Effective Identification of Lynch Syndrome in Gastroenterology Practice.

Muller C, Matthews L, Kupfer S, Weiss J Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2019; 17(4):666-680.

PMID: 31677041 PMC: 6986345. DOI: 10.1007/s11938-019-00261-2.


References
1.
Hall M . Counterpoint: implementing population genetic screening for Lynch Syndrome among newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients--will the ends justify the means?. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010; 8(5):606-11. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2010.0045. View

2.
Herman J, Umar A, Polyak K, Graff J, Ahuja N, Issa J . Incidence and functional consequences of hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation in colorectal carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95(12):6870-5. PMC: 22665. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.12.6870. View

3.
Resnick K, Hampel H, Fishel R, Cohn D . Current and emerging trends in Lynch syndrome identification in women with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2009; 114(1):128-34. PMC: 2841434. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.03.003. View

4.
Burks R, Kessis T, Cho K, Hedrick L . Microsatellite instability in endometrial carcinoma. Oncogene. 1994; 9(4):1163-6. View

5.
Backes F, Mitchell E, Hampel H, Cohn D . Endometrial cancer patients and compliance with genetic counseling: room for improvement. Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 123(3):532-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.09.002. View