» Articles » PMID: 23637588

Learning Multisensory Integration and Coordinate Transformation Via Density Estimation

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2013 May 3
PMID 23637588
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sensory processing in the brain includes three key operations: multisensory integration-the task of combining cues into a single estimate of a common underlying stimulus; coordinate transformations-the change of reference frame for a stimulus (e.g., retinotopic to body-centered) effected through knowledge about an intervening variable (e.g., gaze position); and the incorporation of prior information. Statistically optimal sensory processing requires that each of these operations maintains the correct posterior distribution over the stimulus. Elements of this optimality have been demonstrated in many behavioral contexts in humans and other animals, suggesting that the neural computations are indeed optimal. That the relationships between sensory modalities are complex and plastic further suggests that these computations are learned-but how? We provide a principled answer, by treating the acquisition of these mappings as a case of density estimation, a well-studied problem in machine learning and statistics, in which the distribution of observed data is modeled in terms of a set of fixed parameters and a set of latent variables. In our case, the observed data are unisensory-population activities, the fixed parameters are synaptic connections, and the latent variables are multisensory-population activities. In particular, we train a restricted Boltzmann machine with the biologically plausible contrastive-divergence rule to learn a range of neural computations not previously demonstrated under a single approach: optimal integration; encoding of priors; hierarchical integration of cues; learning when not to integrate; and coordinate transformation. The model makes testable predictions about the nature of multisensory representations.

Citing Articles

Decentralized Neural Circuits of Multisensory Information Integration in the Brain.

Zhang W Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024; 1437:1-21.

PMID: 38270850 DOI: 10.1007/978-981-99-7611-9_1.


A normative model of peripersonal space encoding as performing impact prediction.

Straka Z, Noel J, Hoffmann M PLoS Comput Biol. 2022; 18(9):e1010464.

PMID: 36103520 PMC: 9512250. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010464.


Building and Understanding the Minimal Self.

Forch V, Hamker F Front Psychol. 2021; 12:716982.

PMID: 34899463 PMC: 8660690. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716982.


Disentangling the influences of multiple thalamic nuclei on prefrontal cortex and cognitive control.

Phillips J, Kambi N, Redinbaugh M, Mohanta S, Saalmann Y Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021; 128:487-510.

PMID: 34216654 PMC: 8393355. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.06.042.


From statistical regularities in multisensory inputs to peripersonal space representation and body ownership: Insights from a neural network model.

Bertoni T, Magosso E, Serino A Eur J Neurosci. 2020; 53(2):611-636.

PMID: 32965729 PMC: 7894138. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14981.


References
1.
Hinton G, Osindero S, Teh Y . A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Comput. 2006; 18(7):1527-54. DOI: 10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527. View

2.
Sober S, Sabes P . Multisensory integration during motor planning. J Neurosci. 2003; 23(18):6982-92. PMC: 6740676. View

3.
Knudsen E, Knudsen P . Vision calibrates sound localization in developing barn owls. J Neurosci. 1989; 9(9):3306-13. PMC: 6569657. View

4.
Shipp S, Blanton M, Zeki S . A visuo-somatomotor pathway through superior parietal cortex in the macaque monkey: cortical connections of areas V6 and V6A. Eur J Neurosci. 1998; 10(10):3171-93. DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1998.00327.x. View

5.
Stocker A, Simoncelli E . Noise characteristics and prior expectations in human visual speed perception. Nat Neurosci. 2006; 9(4):578-85. DOI: 10.1038/nn1669. View