» Articles » PMID: 23606959

Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: a Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2013 Apr 23
PMID 23606959
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the recent years minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) has become a well-established and increasingly used option for managing patients with a mitral valve pathology. Nonetheless, whether the purported benefits of MIMVS translate into clinically important outcomes remains controversial. Therefore, in this paper we provide an overview of MIMVS and discuss results, morbidity, mortality, and quality of life following mitral minimally invasive procedures. MIMVS has been proven to be a feasible alternative to the conventional full sternotomy approach with low perioperative morbidity and short-term mortality. Reported benefits of MIMVS include also decreased postoperative pain, improved postoperative respiratory function, reduced surgical trauma, and greater patient satisfaction. Finally, compared to standard surgery, MIMVS demonstrated comparable efficacy across a range of long-term efficacy measures such as freedom from reoperation and long-term survival.

Citing Articles

Contemporary Review of Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: Current Considerations and Innovations.

Alsheebani S, Goubran D, de Varennes B, Chan V J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024; 11(12).

PMID: 39728294 PMC: 11677698. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd11120404.


Current Challenges in Diagnosis and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease.

Samanidis G J Pers Med. 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 39201978 PMC: 11355681. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14080786.


Minimally invasive vs. conventional mitral valve surgery: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Amin A, Kumar R, Mokhtassi S, Alassiri A, Odaman A, Khan M Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1437524.

PMID: 39188318 PMC: 11345173. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1437524.


Decision Making during the Learning Curve of Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: A Focused Review for the Starting Minimally Invasive Surgeon.

Ko K, Verhagen A, de Kroon T, Morshuis W, van Garsse L J Clin Med. 2022; 11(20).

PMID: 36294310 PMC: 9604391. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11205993.


Impact of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery on sexual dysfunction in male patients.

Yan L, Tang M, Dai X, Chen L, Fang G J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022; 17(1):77.

PMID: 35421997 PMC: 9008948. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-022-01814-w.


References
1.
Weinzweig N, Yetman R . Transposition of the greater omentum for recalcitrant median sternotomy wound infections. Ann Plast Surg. 1995; 34(5):471-7. DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199505000-00004. View

2.
Grossi E, Galloway A, LaPietra A, Ribakove G, Ursomanno P, Delianides J . Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a 6-year experience with 714 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002; 74(3):660-3; discussion 663-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03754-2. View

3.
Tabata M, Cohn L . Minimally invasive mitral valve repair with and without robotic technology in the elderly. Am J Geriatr Cardiol. 2006; 15(5):306-10. DOI: 10.1111/j.1076-7460.2006.04881.x. View

4.
Cohn L, Adams D, Couper G, Bichell D, Rosborough D, Sears S . Minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery improves patient satisfaction while reducing costs of cardiac valve replacement and repair. Ann Surg. 1997; 226(4):421-6; discussion 427-8. PMC: 1191053. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199710000-00003. View

5.
Iribarne A, Easterwood R, Russo M, Chan E, Smith C, Argenziano M . Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus traditional sternotomy mitral valve surgery in elderly patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012; 143(4 Suppl):S86-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.090. View