» Articles » PMID: 15942584

Robotic Mitral Valve Surgery: a United States Multicenter Trial

Overview
Date 2005 Jun 9
PMID 15942584
Citations 58
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: In a prospective phase II Food and Drug Administration trial, robotic mitral valve repairs were performed in 112 patients at 10 centers by using the da Vinci surgical system. The safety of performing valve repairs with computerized telemanipulation was studied.

Methods: After institutional review board approval, informed consent was obtained. Patients had moderate to severe mitral regurgitation. Operative technique included peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass, a 4- to 5-cm right minithoracotomy, a transthoracic aortic crossclamp, and antegrade cardioplegia. The successful study end point was grade 0 or 1 mitral regurgitation by transthoracic echocardiography at 1 month after surgery.

Results: Valve repairs included quadrangular resections, sliding plasties, edge-to-edge approximations, and both chordal transfers and replacements. The average age was 56.4 +/- 0.09 years (mean +/- SEM). There were 77 (68.8%) men and 35 (31.2%) women. Valve pathology was myxomatous degeneration in 105 (91.1%), and 103 (92.0%) had type II leaflet prolapse. Leaflet repair times averaged 36.7 +/- 0.2 minutes, with annuloplasty times of 39.6 +/- 0.1 minutes. Total robot, aortic crossclamp, and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 77.9 +/- 0.3 minutes, 2.1 +/- 0.1 hours, and 2.8 +/- 0.1 hours, respectively. On 1-month transthoracic echocardiography, 9 (8.0%) had grade 2 mitral regurgitation, and 6 (5.4%) of these had reoperations (5 replacements and 1 repair). There were no deaths, strokes, or device-related complications.

Conclusions: Multiple surgical teams performed robotic mitral valve repairs safely early in development of this procedure, with a reoperation rate of 5.4%. Advancements in robotic design and adjunctive technologies may help in the evolution of this minimally invasive technique by decreasing operative times.

Citing Articles

A Historical Perspective and Update on Robotic Mitral Valve Surgery.

Chartrain A, Trento A, Gill G, Emerson D, Cheng W, Ramzy D J Clin Med. 2024; 13(21).

PMID: 39518514 PMC: 11546677. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13216375.


Iatrogenic non-coronary leaflet perforation as a complication after robotic mitral valve repair.

Kalangos A, Zorman Y, Guler E, Shatelen N J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024; 19(1):329.

PMID: 38867224 PMC: 11167908. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-02753-4.


Effect of body mass index on clinical outcomes after robotic cardiac surgery: is there an obesity paradox?.

Wu W, Ding R, Chen J, Yuan Y, Song Y, Yan M BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023; 23(1):271.

PMID: 37221463 PMC: 10207724. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-023-03277-w.


Building a successful minimally invasive mitral valve repair program before introducing the robotic approach: The Massachusetts General Hospital experience.

van Kampen A, Goudot G, Butte S, Paneitz D, Borger M, Badhwar V Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1113908.

PMID: 37025683 PMC: 10070799. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1113908.


A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Robot-Assisted Mitral Valve Repair.

Hassanabad A, Nagase F, Basha A, Hammal F, Menon D, Kent W Innovations (Phila). 2022; 17(6):471-481.

PMID: 36529985 PMC: 9846568. DOI: 10.1177/15569845221141488.