» Articles » PMID: 23604624

Multisensory Temporal Integration: Task and Stimulus Dependencies

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2013 Apr 23
PMID 23604624
Citations 97
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ability of human sensory systems to integrate information across the different modalities provides a wide range of behavioral and perceptual benefits. This integration process is dependent upon the temporal relationship of the different sensory signals, with stimuli occurring close together in time typically resulting in the largest behavior changes. The range of temporal intervals over which such benefits are seen is typically referred to as the temporal binding window (TBW). Given the importance of temporal factors in multisensory integration under both normal and atypical circumstances such as autism and dyslexia, the TBW has been measured with a variety of experimental protocols that differ according to criterion, task, and stimulus type, making comparisons across experiments difficult. In the current study, we attempt to elucidate the role that these various factors play in the measurement of this important construct. The results show a strong effect of stimulus type, with the TBW assessed with speech stimuli being both larger and more symmetrical than that seen using simple and complex non-speech stimuli. These effects are robust across task and statistical criteria and are highly consistent within individuals, suggesting substantial overlap in the neural and cognitive operations that govern multisensory temporal processes.

Citing Articles

Behavioral representations within the endogenous dual attentional pathways during audiovisual integration processing.

Guan Z, Yan M, He M, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Li C Front Neurosci. 2025; 19:1536688.

PMID: 40008300 PMC: 11850320. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1536688.


Atypical audio-visual neural synchrony and speech processing in early autism.

Wang X, Bouton S, Kojovic N, Giraud A, Schaer M J Neurodev Disord. 2025; 17(1):9.

PMID: 39966708 PMC: 11837391. DOI: 10.1186/s11689-025-09593-w.


Visual modulation of auditory evoked potentials in the cat.

Bao X, Lomber S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):7177.

PMID: 38531940 PMC: 10965913. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57075-1.


Audiovisual simultaneity windows reflect temporal sensory uncertainty.

Cary E, Lahdesmaki I, Badde S Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 31(5):2170-2179.

PMID: 38388825 PMC: 11543760. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02478-4.


Tactile cues are more intrinsically linked to motor timing than visual cues in visual-tactile sensorimotor synchronization.

Huntley M, Nguyen A, Albrecht M, Marinovic W Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024; 86(3):1022-1037.

PMID: 38263510 PMC: 11062975. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02828-9.


References
1.
Zampini M, Guest S, Shore D, Spence C . Audio-visual simultaneity judgments. Percept Psychophys. 2005; 67(3):531-44. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193329. View

2.
Foss-Feig J, Kwakye L, Cascio C, Burnette C, Kadivar H, Stone W . An extended multisensory temporal binding window in autism spectrum disorders. Exp Brain Res. 2010; 203(2):381-9. PMC: 2871100. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2240-4. View

3.
Vatakis A, Navarra J, Soto-Faraco S, Spence C . Audiovisual temporal adaptation of speech: temporal order versus simultaneity judgments. Exp Brain Res. 2007; 185(3):521-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1168-9. View

4.
Stevenson R, Kim S, James T . An additive-factors design to disambiguate neuronal and areal convergence: measuring multisensory interactions between audio, visual, and haptic sensory streams using fMRI. Exp Brain Res. 2009; 198(2-3):183-94. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1783-8. View

5.
Royal D, Carriere B, Wallace M . Spatiotemporal architecture of cortical receptive fields and its impact on multisensory interactions. Exp Brain Res. 2009; 198(2-3):127-36. PMC: 3637793. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1772-y. View