» Articles » PMID: 38388825

Audiovisual Simultaneity Windows Reflect Temporal Sensory Uncertainty

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2024 Feb 22
PMID 38388825
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ability to judge the temporal alignment of visual and auditory information is a prerequisite for multisensory integration and segregation. However, each temporal measurement is subject to error. Thus, when judging whether a visual and auditory stimulus were presented simultaneously, observers must rely on a subjective decision boundary to distinguish between measurement error and truly misaligned audiovisual signals. Here, we tested whether these decision boundaries are relaxed with increasing temporal sensory uncertainty, i.e., whether participants make the same type of adjustment an ideal observer would make. Participants judged the simultaneity of audiovisual stimulus pairs with varying temporal offset, while being immersed in different virtual environments. To obtain estimates of participants' temporal sensory uncertainty and simultaneity criteria in each environment, an independent-channels model was fitted to their simultaneity judgments. In two experiments, participants' simultaneity decision boundaries were predicted by their temporal uncertainty, which varied unsystematically with the environment. Hence, observers used a flexibly updated estimate of their own audiovisual temporal uncertainty to establish subjective criteria of simultaneity. This finding implies that, under typical circumstances, audiovisual simultaneity windows reflect an observer's cross-modal temporal uncertainty.

Citing Articles

Precision-based causal inference modulates audiovisual temporal recalibration.

Li L, Hong F, Badde S, Landy M Elife. 2025; 13.

PMID: 39996594 PMC: 11856930. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.97765.


Precision-based causal inference modulates audiovisual temporal recalibration.

Li L, Hong F, Badde S, Landy M bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39553952 PMC: 11565745. DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.08.584189.


Auditory guidance of eye movements toward threat-related images in the absence of visual awareness.

Hu J, Badde S, Vetter P Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1441915.

PMID: 39175660 PMC: 11338778. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1441915.

References
1.
Eg R, Behne D . Perceived synchrony for realistic and dynamic audiovisual events. Front Psychol. 2015; 6:736. PMC: 4451240. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00736. View

2.
Hillock-Dunn A, Wallace M . Developmental changes in the multisensory temporal binding window persist into adolescence. Dev Sci. 2012; 15(5):688-96. PMC: 4013750. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01171.x. View

3.
Linares D, Aguilar-Lleyda D, Lopez-Moliner J . Decoupling sensory from decisional choice biases in perceptual decision making. Elife. 2019; 8. PMC: 6459673. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.43994. View

4.
Badde S, Landy M, Adams W . Multisensory causal inference is feature-specific, not object-based. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023; 378(1886):20220345. PMC: 10404918. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0345. View

5.
Yarrow K, Jahn N, Durant S, Arnold D . Shifts of criteria or neural timing? The assumptions underlying timing perception studies. Conscious Cogn. 2011; 20(4):1518-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.07.003. View