» Articles » PMID: 23576716

Gene Similarity Networks Provide Tools for Understanding Eukaryote Origins and Evolution

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2013 Apr 12
PMID 23576716
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The complexity and depth of the relationships between the three domains of life challenge the reliability of phylogenetic methods, encouraging the use of alternative analytical tools. We reconstructed a gene similarity network comprising the proteomes of 14 eukaryotes, 104 prokaryotes, 2,389 viruses and 1,044 plasmids. This network contains multiple signatures of the chimerical origin of Eukaryotes as a fusion of an archaebacterium and a eubacterium that could not have been observed using phylogenetic trees. A number of connected components (gene sets with stronger similarities than expected by chance) contain pairs of eukaryotic sequences exhibiting no direct detectable similarity. Instead, many eukaryotic sequences were indirectly connected through a "eukaryote-archaebacterium-eubacterium-eukaryote" similarity path. Furthermore, eukaryotic genes highly connected to prokaryotic genes from one domain tend not to be connected to genes from the other prokaryotic domain. Genes of archaebacterial and eubacterial ancestry tend to perform different functions and to act at different subcellular compartments, but in such an intertwined way that suggests an early rather than late integration of both gene repertoires. The archaebacterial repertoire has a similar size in all eukaryotic genomes whereas the number of eubacterium-derived genes is much more variable, suggesting a higher plasticity of this gene repertoire. Consequently, highly reduced eukaryotic genomes contain more genes of archaebacterial than eubacterial affinity. Connected components with prokaryotic and eukaryotic genes tend to include viral and plasmid genes, compatible with a role of gene mobility in the origin of Eukaryotes. Our analyses highlight the power of network approaches to study deep evolutionary events.

Citing Articles

Metatranscriptomes-based sequence similarity networks uncover genetic signatures within parasitic freshwater microbial eukaryotes.

Monjot A, Rousseau J, Bittner L, Lepere C Microbiome. 2025; 13(1):43.

PMID: 39915863 PMC: 11800578. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-024-02027-0.


Origins and Functional Significance of Eukaryotic Protein Folds.

Romei M, Carpentier M, Chomilier J, Lecointre G J Mol Evol. 2023; 91(6):854-864.

PMID: 38060007 DOI: 10.1007/s00239-023-10136-x.


On the origin of the nucleus: a hypothesis.

Baum B, Spang A Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2023; 87(4):e0018621.

PMID: 38018971 PMC: 10732040. DOI: 10.1128/mmbr.00186-21.


Constructing gene similarity networks using co-occurrence probabilities.

Mirzaei G BMC Genomics. 2023; 24(1):697.

PMID: 37990157 PMC: 10662556. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-023-09780-w.


Genome enrichment of rare and unknown species from complicated microbiomes by nanopore selective sequencing.

Sun Y, Cheng Z, Li X, Yang Q, Zhao B, Wu Z Genome Res. 2023; 33(4):612-621.

PMID: 37041035 PMC: 10234302. DOI: 10.1101/gr.277266.122.


References
1.
Fondi M, Fani R . The horizontal flow of the plasmid resistome: clues from inter-generic similarity networks. Environ Microbiol. 2010; 12(12):3228-42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02295.x. View

2.
Doolittle W . You are what you eat: a gene transfer ratchet could account for bacterial genes in eukaryotic nuclear genomes. Trends Genet. 1998; 14(8):307-11. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9525(98)01494-2. View

3.
Forterre P, Prangishvili D . The great billion-year war between ribosome- and capsid-encoding organisms (cells and viruses) as the major source of evolutionary novelties. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009; 1178:65-77. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04993.x. View

4.
Li W, Wu C, Luo C . A new method for estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous rates of nucleotide substitution considering the relative likelihood of nucleotide and codon changes. Mol Biol Evol. 1985; 2(2):150-74. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040343. View

5.
Moore C, Archibald J . Nucleomorph genomes. Annu Rev Genet. 2009; 43:251-64. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134809. View