» Articles » PMID: 23567188

A Framework for Fit-for-purpose Dose Response Assessment

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Pharmacology
Toxicology
Date 2013 Apr 10
PMID 23567188
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The NRC report Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment made several recommendations to improve chemical risk assessment, with a focus on in-depth chronic dose-response assessments conducted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The recommendations addressed two broad elements: improving technical analysis and utility for decision making. To advance the discussions in the NRC report, in three multi-stakeholder workshops organized by the Alliance for Risk Assessment, available and evolving risk assessment methodologies were considered through the development and application of case studies. A key product was a framework (http://www.allianceforrisk.org/Workshop/Framework/ProblemFormulation.html) to guide risk assessors and managers to various dose-response assessment methods relevant to a range of decision contexts ranging from priority setting to full assessment, as illustrated by case studies. It is designed to facilitate selection of appropriate methodology for a variety of problem formulations and includes a variety of methods with supporting case studies, for areas flagged specifically by the NRC committee for consideration--e.g., susceptible sub-populations, population variability and background. The framewok contributes to organization and communication about methodologies for incorporating increasingly biologically informed and chemical specific knowledge into dose-response analysis, which is considered critical in evolving fit-for-purpose assessment to address relevant problem formulations.

Citing Articles

A mode of action-based probabilistic framework of dose-response assessment for nonmutagenic liver carcinogens: a case study of PCB-126.

Zhou Y, Chen Q, Klaunig J, Shao K Toxicol Sci. 2023; 196(2):250-260.

PMID: 37643630 PMC: 10682966. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfad091.


An interdisciplinary framework for derivation of occupational exposure limits.

Maurer L, Alexander M, Bachman A, Grimm F, Lewis R, North C Front Public Health. 2022; 10:1038305.

PMID: 36530659 PMC: 9748553. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1038305.


A Framework that Considers the Impacts of Time, Cost, and Uncertainty in the Determination of the Cost Effectiveness of Toxicity-Testing Methodologies.

Price P, Hubbell B, Hagiwara S, Paoli G, Krewski D, Guiseppi-Elie A Risk Anal. 2021; 42(4):707-729.

PMID: 34490933 PMC: 9290960. DOI: 10.1111/risa.13810.


Advancing human health risk assessment: integrating recent advisory committee recommendations.

Dourson M, Becker R, Haber L, Pottenger L, Bredfeldt T, Fenner-Crisp P Crit Rev Toxicol. 2013; 43(6):467-92.

PMID: 23844697 PMC: 3725687. DOI: 10.3109/10408444.2013.807223.