» Articles » PMID: 23561631

Beyond Mammography: New Frontiers in Breast Cancer Screening

Overview
Journal Am J Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2013 Apr 9
PMID 23561631
Citations 64
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Breast cancer screening remains a subject of intense and, at times, passionate debate. Mammography has long been the mainstay of breast cancer detection and is the only screening test proven to reduce mortality. Although it remains the gold standard of breast cancer screening, there is increasing awareness of subpopulations of women for whom mammography has reduced sensitivity. Mammography also has undergone increased scrutiny for false positives and excessive biopsies, which increase radiation dose, cost, and patient anxiety. In response to these challenges, new technologies for breast cancer screening have been developed, including low-dose mammography, contrast-enhanced mammography, tomosynthesis, automated whole breast ultrasound, molecular imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging. Here we examine some of the current controversies and promising new technologies that may improve detection of breast cancer both in the general population and in high-risk groups, such as women with dense breasts. We propose that optimal breast cancer screening will ultimately require a personalized approach based on metrics of cancer risk with selective application of specific screening technologies best suited to the individual's age, risk, and breast density.

Citing Articles

Community pharmacists' role in prevention of breast cancer - is it possible?.

Brzykcy K, Nowaczyk P, Liwiarska J, Waszyk-Nowaczyk M Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2025; 29(4):516-522.

PMID: 39895964 PMC: 11785382. DOI: 10.5603/rpor.101992.


Identification of Individuals With Hereditary Cancer Risk Through Multiple Data Sources: A Population-Based Method Using the GARDE Platform and The Utah Population Database.

Del Fiol G, Madsen M, Bradshaw R, Newman M, Kaphingst K, Tavtigian S JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024; 8:e2400142.

PMID: 39571109 PMC: 11583850. DOI: 10.1200/CCI-24-00142.


Explainable breast cancer molecular expression prediction using multi-task deep-learning based on 3D whole breast ultrasound.

Huang Z, Zhang X, Ju Y, Zhang G, Chang W, Song H Insights Imaging. 2024; 15(1):227.

PMID: 39320560 PMC: 11424596. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01810-9.


Barriers to Breast Cancer Screening in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Alsalamh R, Al-Harbi F, Alotaibi R, Al-Harbi O, Alshahrani N, Alfadhel S Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e65103.

PMID: 39170991 PMC: 11338644. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65103.


Recent progress in Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy detection of biomarkers in liquid biopsy for breast cancer.

Liu X, Jia Y, Zheng C Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1400498.

PMID: 39040452 PMC: 11260621. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1400498.


References
1.
van Gils C, Otten J, Verbeek A, Hendriks J . Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: masking bias or causality?. Eur J Epidemiol. 1998; 14(4):315-20. DOI: 10.1023/a:1007423824675. View

2.
Feig S, Hendrick R . Radiation risk from screening mammography of women aged 40-49 years. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997; (22):119-24. DOI: 10.1093/jncimono/1997.22.119. View

3.
Berg W, Campassi C, Langenberg P, Sexton M . Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 174(6):1769-77. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.174.6.1741769. View

4.
Plevritis S, Kurian A, Sigal B, Daniel B, Ikeda D, Stockdale F . Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA. 2006; 295(20):2374-84. DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.20.2374. View

5.
Dromain C, Thibault F, Diekmann F, Fallenberg E, Jong R, Koomen M . Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study. Breast Cancer Res. 2012; 14(3):R94. PMC: 3446357. DOI: 10.1186/bcr3210. View