» Articles » PMID: 23560087

Quantitative Design of Regulatory Elements Based on High-precision Strength Prediction Using Artificial Neural Network

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Apr 6
PMID 23560087
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Accurate and controllable regulatory elements such as promoters and ribosome binding sites (RBSs) are indispensable tools to quantitatively regulate gene expression for rational pathway engineering. Therefore, de novo designing regulatory elements is brought back to the forefront of synthetic biology research. Here we developed a quantitative design method for regulatory elements based on strength prediction using artificial neural network (ANN). One hundred mutated Trc promoter & RBS sequences, which were finely characterized with a strength distribution from 0 to 3.559 (relative to the strength of the original sequence which was defined as 1), were used for model training and test. A precise strength prediction model, NET90_19_576, was finally constructed with high regression correlation coefficients of 0.98 for both model training and test. Sixteen artificial elements were in silico designed using this model. All of them were proved to have good consistency between the measured strength and our desired strength. The functional reliability of the designed elements was validated in two different genetic contexts. The designed parts were successfully utilized to improve the expression of BmK1 peptide toxin and fine-tune deoxy-xylulose phosphate pathway in Escherichia coli. Our results demonstrate that the methodology based on ANN model can de novo and quantitatively design regulatory elements with desired strengths, which are of great importance for synthetic biology applications.

Citing Articles

Systematic representation and optimization enable the inverse design of cross-species regulatory sequences in bacteria.

Zhang P, Du Q, Wang Y, Wei L, Wang X Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1763.

PMID: 39971994 PMC: 11840067. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57031-1.


Towards AI-designed genomes using a variational autoencoder.

Dudek N, Precup D Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2036):20241457.

PMID: 39657811 PMC: 11631412. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1457.


Transfer learning for cross-context prediction of protein expression from 5'UTR sequence.

Gilliot P, Gorochowski T Nucleic Acids Res. 2024; 52(13):e58.

PMID: 38864396 PMC: 11260469. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae491.


Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Synthetic Biology: Key Architectures, Applications, and Challenges.

Goshisht M ACS Omega. 2024; 9(9):9921-9945.

PMID: 38463314 PMC: 10918679. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c05913.


Simulated Design-Build-Test-Learn Cycles for Consistent Comparison of Machine Learning Methods in Metabolic Engineering.

van Lent P, Schmitz J, Abeel T ACS Synth Biol. 2023; 12(9):2588-2599.

PMID: 37616156 PMC: 10510747. DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.3c00186.


References
1.
Dehli T, Solem C, Jensen P . Tunable promoters in synthetic and systems biology. Subcell Biochem. 2012; 64:181-201. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-5055-5_9. View

2.
Puigbo P, Guzman E, Romeu A, Garcia-Vallve S . OPTIMIZER: a web server for optimizing the codon usage of DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35(Web Server issue):W126-31. PMC: 1933141. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm219. View

3.
Levine E, Zhang Z, Kuhlman T, Hwa T . Quantitative characteristics of gene regulation by small RNA. PLoS Biol. 2007; 5(9):e229. PMC: 1994261. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050229. View

4.
Koessler D, Knisley D, Knisley J, Haynes T . A predictive model for secondary RNA structure using graph theory and a neural network. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010; 11 Suppl 6:S21. PMC: 3026369. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S6-S21. View

5.
Harley C, Reynolds R . Analysis of E. coli promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987; 15(5):2343-61. PMC: 340638. DOI: 10.1093/nar/15.5.2343. View