Fiber Density Estimation from Single Q-shell Diffusion Imaging by Tensor Divergence
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging provides information about the nerve fiber bundle geometry of the human brain. While the inference of the underlying fiber bundle orientation only requires single q-shell measurements, the absolute determination of their volume fractions is much more challenging with respect to measurement techniques and analysis. Unfortunately, the usually employed multi-compartment models cannot be applied to single q-shell measurements, because the compartment's diffusivities cannot be resolved. This work proposes an equation for fiber orientation densities that can infer the absolute fraction up to a global factor. This equation, which is inspired by the classical mass preservation law in fluid dynamics, expresses the fiber conservation associated with the assumption that fibers do not terminate in white matter. Simulations on synthetic phantoms show that the approach is able to derive the densities correctly for various configurations. Experiments with a pseudo ground truth phantom show that even for complex, brain-like geometries the method is able to infer the densities correctly. In-vivo results with 81 healthy volunteers are plausible and consistent. A group analysis with respect to age and gender show significant differences, such that the proposed maps can be used as a quantitative measure for group and longitudinal analysis.
Towards in vivo g-ratio mapping using MRI: Unifying myelin and diffusion imaging.
Mohammadi S, Callaghan M J Neurosci Methods. 2020; 348:108990.
PMID: 33129894 PMC: 7840525. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108990.
hMRI - A toolbox for quantitative MRI in neuroscience and clinical research.
Tabelow K, Balteau E, Ashburner J, Callaghan M, Draganski B, Helms G Neuroimage. 2019; 194:191-210.
PMID: 30677501 PMC: 6547054. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.029.
Sparse Estimation of Resting-State Effective Connectivity From fMRI Cross-Spectra.
Lennartz C, Schiefer J, Rotter S, Hennig J, Levan P Front Neurosci. 2018; 12:287.
PMID: 29867310 PMC: 5951985. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00287.
Four in vivo g-ratio-weighted imaging methods: Comparability and repeatability at the group level.
Ellerbrock I, Mohammadi S Hum Brain Mapp. 2017; 39(1):24-41.
PMID: 29091341 PMC: 6866374. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23858.
Evaluating g-ratio weighted changes in the corpus callosum as a function of age and sex.
Berman S, West K, Does M, Yeatman J, Mezer A Neuroimage. 2017; 182:304-313.
PMID: 28673882 PMC: 5748016. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.076.