» Articles » PMID: 23525901

Determination of Breath Isoprene Allows the Identification of the Expiratory Fraction of the Propofol Breath Signal During Real-time Propofol Breath Monitoring

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2013 Mar 26
PMID 23525901
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Real-time measurement of propofol in the breath may be used for routine clinical monitoring. However, this requires unequivocal identification of the expiratory phase of the respiratory propofol signal as only expiratory propofol reflects propofol blood concentrations. Determination of CO2 breath concentrations is the current gold standard for the identification of expiratory gas but usually requires additional equipment. Human breath also contains isoprene, a volatile organic compound with low inspiratory breath concentration and an expiratory concentration plateau. We investigated whether breath isoprene could be used similarly to CO2 to identify the expiratory fraction of the propofol breath signal. We investigated real-time breath data obtained from 40 study subjects during routine anesthesia. Propofol, isoprene, and CO2 breath concentrations were determined by a combined ion molecule reaction/electron impact mass spectrometry system. The expiratory propofol signal was identified according to breath CO2 and isoprene concentrations and presented as median of intervals of 30 s duration. Bland-Altman analysis was applied to detect differences (bias) in the expiratory propofol signal extracted by the two identification methods. We investigated propofol signals in a total of 3,590 observation intervals of 30 s duration in the 40 study subjects. In 51.4 % of the intervals (1,844/3,590) both methods extracted the same results for expiratory propofol signal. Overall bias between the two data extraction methods was -0.12 ppb. The lower and the upper limits of the 95 % CI were -0.69 and 0.45 ppb. Determination of isoprene breath concentrations allows the identification of the expiratory propofol signal during real-time breath monitoring.

Citing Articles

Online monitoring of propofol concentrations in exhaled breath.

Li X, Chang P, Zhang W Heliyon. 2025; 10(24):e39704.

PMID: 39759290 PMC: 11699084. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39704.


Online exhaled propofol monitoring in normal-weight and obese surgical patients.

Braathen M, Rimstad I, Dybvik T, Nygard S, Raeder J Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022; 66(5):598-605.

PMID: 35138633 PMC: 9305953. DOI: 10.1111/aas.14043.


Discriminant Profiles of Volatile Compounds in the Alveolar Air of Patients with Squamous Cell Lung Cancer, Lung Adenocarcinoma or Colon Cancer.

Politi L, Monasta L, Rigressi M, Princivalle A, Gonfiotti A, Camiciottoli G Molecules. 2021; 26(3).

PMID: 33494458 PMC: 7866040. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26030550.


Graphene quantum dots as nanoprobes for fluorescent detection of propofol in emulsions.

Diao J, Wang T, Li L R Soc Open Sci. 2019; 6(1):181753.

PMID: 30800401 PMC: 6366175. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.181753.


Propofol Breath Monitoring as a Potential Tool to Improve the Prediction of Intraoperative Plasma Concentrations.

Colin P, Eleveld D, van den Berg J, Vereecke H, Struys M, Schelling G Clin Pharmacokinet. 2015; 55(7):849-859.

PMID: 26715214 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-015-0358-z.

References
1.
Dolch M, Frey L, Hornuss C, Schmoelz M, Praun S, Villinger J . Molecular breath-gas analysis by online mass spectrometry in mechanically ventilated patients: a new software-based method of CO(2)-controlled alveolar gas monitoring. J Breath Res. 2011; 2(3):037010. DOI: 10.1088/1752-7155/2/3/037010. View

2.
Bland J, Altman D . Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet. 1995; 346(8982):1085-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91748-9. View

3.
Grossherr M, Hengstenberg A, Dibbelt L, Igl B, Noel R, Knesebeck A . Blood gas partition coefficient and pulmonary extraction ratio for propofol in goats and pigs. Xenobiotica. 2009; 39(10):782-7. DOI: 10.1080/00498250903056109. View

4.
King J, Kupferthaler A, Unterkofler K, Koc H, Teschl S, Teschl G . Isoprene and acetone concentration profiles during exercise on an ergometer. J Breath Res. 2011; 3(2):027006. DOI: 10.1088/1752-7155/3/2/027006. View

5.
Takita A, Masui K, Kazama T . On-line monitoring of end-tidal propofol concentration in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology. 2007; 106(4):659-64. DOI: 10.1097/01.anes.0000264745.63275.59. View