Humans Use Compression Heuristics to Improve the Recall of Social Networks
Authors
Affiliations
The ability of primates, including humans, to maintain large social networks appears to depend on the ratio of the neocortex to the rest of the brain. However, observed human network size frequently exceeds predictions based on this ratio (e.g., "Dunbar's Number"), implying that human networks are too large to be cognitively managed. Here I show that humans adaptively use compression heuristics to allow larger amounts of social information to be stored in the same brain volume. I find that human adults can remember larger numbers of relationships in greater detail when a network exhibits triadic closure and kin labels than when it does not. These findings help to explain how humans manage large and complex social networks with finite cognitive resources and suggest that many of the unusual properties of human social networks are rooted in the strategies necessary to cope with cognitive limitations.
Abstract cognitive maps of social network structure aid adaptive inference.
Son J, Bhandari A, FeldmanHall O Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(47):e2310801120.
PMID: 37963254 PMC: 10666027. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2310801120.
Random sampling of alters from networks: A promising direction in egocentric network research.
Peng S, Roth A, Perry B Soc Networks. 2023; 72:52-58.
PMID: 36936369 PMC: 10022747. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2022.09.004.
Who is Dropped and Why? Methodological and Substantive Accounts for Network Loss.
Fischer C, Offer S Soc Networks. 2022; 61:78-86.
PMID: 35875821 PMC: 9302580. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2019.08.008.
How New is "New"? Who Gets Added in a Panel Study of Personal Networks?.
Offer S, Fischer C Soc Networks. 2022; 70:284-294.
PMID: 35600208 PMC: 9116615. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2022.02.011.
Cognitive maps of social features enable flexible inference in social networks.
Son J, Bhandari A, FeldmanHall O Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(39).
PMID: 34518372 PMC: 8488581. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2021699118.