» Articles » PMID: 22353723

Humans and Chimpanzees Attend Differently to Goal-directed Actions

Overview
Journal Nat Commun
Specialty Biology
Date 2012 Feb 23
PMID 22353723
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Humans comprehend the actions of others by making inferences about intentional mental states of another. However, little is known about how this capacity develops and whether this is shared with other animals. Here we show the ontogenetic and evolutionary foundations of this ability by comparing the eye movements of 8- and 12-month-old human infants, adults and chimpanzees as they watched videos presenting goal-directed and non-goal-directed actions by an actor. We find that chimpanzees anticipate action goals in the same way as do human adults. Humans and chimpanzees, however, scan goal-directed actions differently. Humans, particularly infants, refer to actors' faces significantly more than do chimpanzees. In human adults, attentional allocation to an actor's face changes as the goal-directed actions proceed. In the case of non-goal-directed actions, human adults attend less often to faces relative to goal-directed actions. These findings indicate that humans have a predisposition to observe goal-directed actions by integrating information from the actor.

Citing Articles

Humans and great apes visually track event roles in similar ways.

Wilson V, Sauppe S, Brocard S, Ringen E, Daum M, Wermelinger S PLoS Biol. 2024; 22(11):e3002857.

PMID: 39591401 PMC: 11593759. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002857.


Chimpanzees utilize video as reference in a spatiotemporally distant search for hidden food.

Xu S, Tomonaga M, Adachi I R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(9):240440.

PMID: 39323549 PMC: 11421892. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.240440.


Exploring the use of projected videos to test action matching from different perspectives in dogs.

Fugazza C, Higaki F Biol Futur. 2024; .

PMID: 38714588 DOI: 10.1007/s42977-024-00222-6.


Do dogs preferentially encode the identity of the target object or the location of others' actions?.

Lonardo L, Volter C, Hepach R, Lamm C, Huber L Anim Cogn. 2024; 27(1):28.

PMID: 38553650 PMC: 10980658. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-024-01870-w.


Dogs Rely On Visual Cues Rather Than On Effector-Specific Movement Representations to Predict Human Action Targets.

Lonardo L, Volter C, Lamm C, Huber L Open Mind (Camb). 2023; 7:588-607.

PMID: 37840756 PMC: 10575556. DOI: 10.1162/opmi_a_00096.


References
1.
Woodward A . Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach. Cognition. 1999; 69(1):1-34. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00058-4. View

2.
Russell C, Bard K, Adamson L . Social referencing by young chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol. 1997; 111(2):185-93. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.111.2.185. View

3.
Pika S, Zuberbuhler K . Social games between bonobos and humans: evidence for shared intentionality?. Am J Primatol. 2007; 70(3):207-10. DOI: 10.1002/ajp.20469. View

4.
Kano F, Tomonaga M . Species difference in the timing of gaze movement between chimpanzees and humans. Anim Cogn. 2011; 14(6):879-92. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-011-0422-5. View

5.
Ferrari P, Bonini L, Fogassi L . From monkey mirror neurons to primate behaviours: possible 'direct' and 'indirect' pathways. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009; 364(1528):2311-23. PMC: 2865083. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0062. View