Young Women's Perceptions of the Benefits of Childbearing: Associations with Contraceptive Use and Pregnancy

Overview

Journal Perspect Sex Reprod Health

Specialty Health Services

Date 2013 Mar 16

PMID 23489854

Citations 17

Authors

Corinne H Rocca

Cynthia C Harper

Tina R Raine-Bennett

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Context: High unintended pregnancy rates, and inconsistencies between reported pregnancy intentions and contraceptive behaviors, have been well documented among young U.S. women. Women's beliefs about the benefits of childbearing and motherhood may be related to the apparent disconnect between pregnancy intentions and reproductive outcomes.

Methods: Perceived benefits of childbearing and feelings about a potential pregnancy were assessed among 1,377 women aged 15-24 (most of them black or Latina) participating in a longitudinal study in 2005-2008. The women, who were initiating hormonal contraception at public family planning clinics and did not want to become pregnant for one year, were followed for 12 months. Differences in perceived benefits of childbearing by participant characteristics were examined with linear regression, using a new multi-item measure. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to investigate the association of perceived benefits of childbearing with subsequent contraceptive discontinuation and pregnancy.

Results: Perceptions of the benefits of childbearing decreased with increasing age (coefficient, -0.04), and white women perceived fewer benefits to childbearing than blacks (-0.2). As women's perception of the benefits of childbearing increased, their one-year pregnancy rates increased, after demographic characteristics and feelings about a potential pregnancy were controlled for (hazard ratio, 1.2). Benefits of childbearing were not associated with contraceptive discontinuation.

Conclusions: To better assess pregnancy risk among young women wanting to avoid pregnancy, it may be useful to acknowledge that they hold not only explicit pregnancy desires, but also beliefs about the benefits of childbearing, which may influence sexual behavior and pregnancy.

Citing Articles

Contraceptive access experiences and perspectives of Mexican-origin youth: a binational qualitative study.

Mitchell A, Gutmann-Gonzalez A, Brindis C, Decker M Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023; 31(1):2216527.

PMID: 37335382 PMC: 10281292. DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2216527.

Women's healthcare decision-making and unmet need for contraception in Mali.

Ameyaw E, Seidu A, Ahinkorah B Reprod Health. 2022; 19(1):183.

PMID: 35987680 PMC: 9392281. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-022-01484-w.

Prevalence of and factors associated with contraceptive discontinuation in Kenya.

Kungu W, Agwanda A, Khasakhala A Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2022; 14(1):e1-e11.

PMID: 35695442 PMC: 9210174. DOI: 10.4102/phcfm.v14i1.2992.

Shedding light on attitudes towards pregnancy among Inuit adolescents from Nunavik.

Moisan C, Belanger R, Fraser S, Muckle G Int J Circumpolar Health. 2022; 81(1):2051335.

PMID: 35319351 PMC: 8956303. DOI: 10.1080/22423982.2022.2051335.

Teen Perceptions of Sexual Activity: Influences, consequences, realities, and thoughts on safe sexual health practices.

Herrman J Dela J Public Health. 2021; 3(1):66-76.

PMID: 34466900 PMC: 8352461. DOI: 10.32481/djph.2017.03.010.

References

Raine T, Foster-Rosales A, Upadhyay U, Boyer C, Brown B, Sokoloff A . One-year contraceptive continuation and pregnancy in adolescent girls and women initiating hormonal contraceptives. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117(2 Pt 1):363-371. PMC: 3154007. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820563d3. View

Bartz D, Shew M, Ofner S, Fortenberry J . Pregnancy intentions and contraceptive behaviors among adolescent women: a coital event level analysis. J Adolesc Health. 2007; 41(3):271-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.04.014. View

Dennis A, Grossman D . Barriers to contraception and interest in over-the-counter access among low-income women: a qualitative study. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012; 44(2):84-91. DOI: 10.1363/4408412. View

Kendall C, Afable-Munsuz A, Speizer I, Avery A, Schmidt N, Santelli J . Understanding pregnancy in a population of inner-city women in New Orleans--results of qualitative research. Soc Sci Med. 2004; 60(2):297-311. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.05.007. View

Hays R, Morales L, Reise S . Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Med Care. 2000; 38(9 Suppl):II28-42. PMC: 1815384. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200009002-00007. View

Unger J, Molina G, Teran L . Perceived consequences of teenage childbearing among adolescent girls in an urban sample. J Adolesc Health. 2000; 26(3):205-12. DOI: 10.1016/s1054-139x(99)00067-1. View

Gilliam M, Warden M, Goldstein C, Tapia B . Concerns about contraceptive side effects among young Latinas: a focus-group approach. Contraception. 2004; 70(4):299-305. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.04.013. View

Sheeder J, Teal S, Crane L, Stevens-Simon C . Adolescent childbearing ambivalence: is it the sum of its parts?. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2009; 23(2):86-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2009.06.002. View

Petersen R, Gazmararian J, Anderson Clark K, Green D . How contraceptive use patterns differ by pregnancy intention: implications for counseling. Womens Health Issues. 2001; 11(5):427-35. DOI: 10.1016/s1049-3867(01)00090-1. View

10.

Abma J, Martinez G, Copen C . Teenagers in the United States: sexual activity, contraceptive use, and childbearing, national survey of family growth 2006-2008. Vital Health Stat 23. 2011; (30):1-47. View

11.

Rosengard C, Phipps M, Adler N, Ellen J . Adolescent pregnancy intentions and pregnancy outcomes: a longitudinal examination. J Adolesc Health. 2004; 35(6):453-61. PMC: 1602042. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.02.018. View

12.

Finer L, Zolna M . Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006. Contraception. 2011; 84(5):478-85. PMC: 3338192. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.013. View

13.

Mosher W, Jones J . Use of contraception in the United States: 1982-2008. Vital Health Stat 23. 2010; (29):1-44. View

14.

Wilson M, Allen D, Li J . Improving measurement in health education and health behavior research using item response modeling: comparison with the classical test theory approach. Health Educ Res. 2006; 21 Suppl 1:i19-32. DOI: 10.1093/her/cyl053. View

15.

Rosengard C, Pollock L, Weitzen S, Meers A, Phipps M . Concepts of the advantages and disadvantages of teenage childbearing among pregnant adolescents: a qualitative analysis. Pediatrics. 2006; 118(2):503-10. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-3058. View

16.

Rocca C, Hubbard A, Johnson-Hanks J, Padian N, Minnis A . Predictive ability and stability of adolescents' pregnancy intentions in a predominantly Latino community. Stud Fam Plann. 2011; 41(3):179-92. PMC: 3265987. DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2010.00242.x. View

17.

Uebelacker L, Strong D, Weinstock L, Miller I . Use of item response theory to understand differential functioning of DSM-IV major depression symptoms by race, ethnicity and gender. Psychol Med. 2008; 39(4):591-601. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291708003875. View

18.

Moos M, Petersen R, Meadows K, Melvin C, Spitz A . Pregnant women's perspectives on intendedness of pregnancy. Womens Health Issues. 1998; 7(6):385-92. DOI: 10.1016/s1049-3867(97)00081-9. View

19.

Sable M . Pregnancy intentions may not be a useful measure for research on maternal and child health outcomes. Fam Plann Perspect. 2000; 31(5):249-50. View

20.

Gipson J, Koenig M, Hindin M . The effects of unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and parental health: a review of the literature. Stud Fam Plann. 2008; 39(1):18-38. DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2008.00148.x. View